Commissioner Of State Taxes Jammu And Kashmir Govt Excise And Taxation And Others vs. M/S 92.7 Fm And Another
Held
The Court held that the learned Tribunal correctly dismissed the petition for condonation of delay. The Court interpreted Section 12(D) of the J&K GST Act, 1962, along with its first proviso, to mean that the maximum period for filing an application for reference to the High Court is 90 days from the communication of the Tribunal's appellate order. The Court noted that the appellate order was communicated on 29.02.2022. Therefore, the reference application should have been filed by 29.04.2022 (60 days) or by 29.05.2022 (including the 30-day grace period, subject to sufficient cause). Since the application was filed on 14.11.2019, it was clearly barred by limitation under Section 12(D). The Court further clarified that Section 12(B) of the GST Act, 1962, applies to appeals and revisions, but does not extend to the filing of references under Section 12(D). Consequently, the judgments cited by the petitioners, which relied on the applicability of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, were deemed not applicable to this case. The order of the appellate authority had attained finality.
Facts
The petitioners, the Commissioner State Taxes and others, are challenging an order dated 22.12.2020 passed by the Chairman, Jammu & Kashmir Sales Tax (Appellate) Tribunal. This order dismissed the petitioners' petition for condonation of delay and, consequently, their petition seeking reference of questions of law. The dispute originated from the Assessing Authority's demand of sales tax, interest, and penalty from respondent M/s. 92.7 FM for the accounting years 2007-08 and 2008-09, on the grounds that their advertisement broadcasting activity was exigible to tax. The respondent's appeals to the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) were dismissed, but the Sales Tax Tribunal accepted their appeals. The High Court had previously directed the petitioners to file an application for reference of law within three weeks, excluding the period spent in High Court proceedings for limitation calculation. The petitioners filed this application on 14.11.2019.
Key Issues
1. Whether the learned Tribunal erred in dismissing the petition for condonation of delay on the grounds of limitation, by not considering the provisions of Section 12-B of the J&K GST Act, 1962, which mandates the application of Sections 5 and 12 of the Limitation Act, Samvat 1995, to appeals and revisions filed before appellate authorities and tribunals? (Question of law) Contentions: Petitioner (Department): The learned Tribunal failed to consider Section 12-B of the J&K GST Act, 1962, making its order unsustainable. The delay was sufficiently explained in the application for condonation. Respondent (92.7 FM): The learned Tribunal has the power to condone delay but not beyond 90 days (including the extended period of 30 days) in the absence of Section 5 of the Limitation Act's applicability. The petition for reference was barred by limitation, and the Tribunal rightly dismissed the condonation application.
Sections Cited
Section 7, Section 8(8), Section 11-A, Section 12-B, Section 12-D, Section 5, Section 12
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Reserved on 04.12.2023 Pronounced on 12.12.2023
WP(C) No.421/2021
Commissioner State Taxes, Jammu & Kashmir Government, Excise and Taxation Complex, Rail Head, Jammu.
Deputy Commissioner Sales Tax (Appeals), (Appellant Authority) Excise and Taxation Complex, Rail Head, Jammu.
Assessing Authority, Commercial Taxes Circle “L”, Excise & Taxation Complex, Jammu
…..Petitioners
Through: Mr. D.C. Raina, Advocate General, with Mr. K.D.S. Kotwal, Dy.A.G. versus
M/s. 92.7 FM C/o Adlab Films Pvt. Ltd. Near Petrol Pump, Narwal, Jammu.
J&K Sales Tax (Appellate) Tribunal, Excise & Taxation Complex, Rail Head, Jammu, Through its Ld. Judicial Member
.….Respondent(s)
…..Proforma Respondent Through: Mr. Sachin Sharma, Advocate.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TASHI RABSTAN, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
2 WP(C) 421/2021
JUDGMENT Tashi Rabstan - J
This petition is directed against the order dated
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.