Dmicdc Neemrana Solar Power Company Limited vs. State Of Rajasthan
Held
The Court allowed the writ petition, holding that the respondents are liable to issue 'C' Forms to the petitioner for the High Speed Diesel procured for its power generation plant through inter-state trade. The Court reasoned that the provisions of Section 8 of the CST Act and Rule 12 of the CST (R&T) Rules, concerning the issuance of 'C' Forms, have not undergone amendments that would restrict their usage. The Court noted that the petitioner's registration under Section 7(2) of the CST Act is still valid and has not been cancelled, and cancellation can only occur within the parameters of Section 4 of the CST Act. The Court found no distinction between the petitioner's case and the precedent set in Carpo Power Limited, where similar relief was granted. The ratio decidendi is that 'C' Forms are to be issued for goods purchased for use in electricity generation if the dealer is registered under Section 7(2) of the CST Act and the registration is valid. The Court directed the respondents to issue 'C' Forms to the petitioner. In the event the petitioner had paid any excess tax due to the wrongful refusal to issue 'C' Forms, they are entitled to a refund or adjustment from the concerned authorities, who must process such claims within twelve weeks of the petitioner making a written claim with requisite documents.
Facts
The petitioner, Dmicdc Neemrana Solar Power Company Limited, approached the Rajasthan High Court seeking a direction to the respondents (State of Rajasthan and its tax authorities) to issue 'C' Forms. The petitioner intended to procure High Speed Diesel through inter-state trade for its power generation plant. The petitioner argued that the controversy was identical to that decided in previous cases, specifically Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors. and Carpo Power Limited. The respondents are the State of Rajasthan, Commissioner of Commercial Tax Department, and Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer. The specific tax period and amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the provided text, but the core issue revolves around the eligibility for 'C' Forms for High Speed Diesel used in electricity generation.
Key Issues
1. Whether the respondents are legally obligated to issue 'C' Forms to the petitioner for the procurement of High Speed Diesel for use in electricity generation, considering the provisions of the Central Sales Tax (CST) Act and the subsequent implementation of GST laws? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the provisions of Section 8 of the CST Act and Rule 12 of the CST (R&T) Rules, along with declaration Form C, have not been amended in a way that restricts their usage. They contended that the purchase of goods for purposes like use in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale, or in generation or distribution of electricity, qualifies the purchaser for registration under Section 7(2) of the CST Act. Furthermore, the petitioner's registration certificate under the CST Act remains valid and has not been cancelled as per Section 7(4) of the CST Act. They relied on the judgments in Carpo Power Limited and Hindustan Zinc Limited, which held that 'C' Forms should be issued for such purposes. Revenue's Contention: The judgment does not explicitly record any specific arguments made by the respondents. However, the Court's reasoning implies that the respondents' refusal to issue 'C' Forms was based on a misinterpretation or restriction of the applicable provisions.
Sections Cited
Section 8, Section 7(2), Section 7(4), Section 4, Rule 12
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11490/2019 Dmicdc Neemrana Solar Power Company Limited, Having Its Plant At Sp1-32 And Sp-80 And 81, Riico Industrial Area, Neemrana, Shahjahanpur, Alwar-301705 Through Its Chief Financial Officer Mr. Pradeep Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Raman Lal Gupta Aged About 55 Years R/o C-88, Sector-39, Noida, Gautambudh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh. ----Petitioner Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Finance Department (Tax Division), 1St Floor, Main Building, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan 302005
Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Kar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302006
Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer, Ward-Ii, Circle-A, Alwar.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Through Its Divisional Office, First Floor, Lic Investment Building, Phase-Ii, Near Ambedkar Circle, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDRA SINGH SIRADHANA Order 08/07/2019 Counsel for the petitioner submits that identical controversy has already been raised, considered and adjudi
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.