Sachdeva Metal Works vs. The State Of Telangana

Original PDF →
WP/8113/2025HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01005878202519 March 2025Bench: SUJOY PAUL,RENUKA YARA4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI M.S. BALASUBRAMANIUM, CounselfortheRespondents:SPEGIALGovTPLEADERFoRSTATETAx

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3446l sachdeva Metal works, Rep.by its partner Sh. Varpreet sinoh, S/o.s. Rai inder Singh, aged about 59 ye_ars,- Ryo.ptot No. ai2, b"rrttimT iVigai, e"fr'il;L Hyd era bad, Te la n gana-50'0092. Between: AND HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE . PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTIbE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION NO: 8113 0F 2025 .....PETITIONER 1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by-its principal Secretary, Department of Commercial Taxes, Telangana Secretariat at Hyderakiad. 2. Assistant Commissioner, (GST), Khairatabad, Somajiguda_ll Circle, Punjagutta Division, Hydeiabad, Telangana. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an approprlate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order dated 30.04.2024 (Annexure P-'r2) whereby the Respondent No. 2 has confirmed the demand of tax amounting to Rs.6,69,24,206t- for the Financiar year 2o1g-1g under section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 being arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction and in gross defiance to earlier order dated 06.o2.2o24 (Annexure p-10) passed by the Respondent No. 2 for the period 2o1B-19 whereby the Respondent has dropped the proceedings under section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 against the petitioner initiated uncler similar set of facts and allegatio ns/discrepancies and consequently set aside the impugned order dated 30 04'2024 |.A.NO:1 OF 2025 Petition Uncler section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furtler proceedings pursuant to thq impugned order dated 30.04.2024 (Annexure P-12) whereby the Respondent No 2 has confirmed the demand of tax amounting to Rs.6,69 ,24,2061- for the Financial Year 2018-19 underSectionT3o{theGSTAct,20lT,pendingdisposaloftheabovewrit petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.S. BALASUBRAMANIUM CounselfortheRespondents:SPEGIALGovTPLEADERFoRSTATETAx

The Court made-the following ORDER

THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA trIRIT PETITION No. 8113 of 2O25 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul) Sri M.Balasubramanium, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to the petitioner to file a properly constituted petition.

2.

Prayer is allowed

3.

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //II .N. SRIHARI TANT REGISTRAR ASS To SA LS {4- SECTION OFFICER

1.

One CC to S

2.

One CC to S

3.

Two CD Cop Rl M-S-BALASUBRAMANTUM, Advocate tOpUCl PECIAL Gow PLEADER ron siniE-iil, XI'J"""," topucl

HIGH COURT DATED:1910312025 ORDER WP.No.8113 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. ,4 ,1 ..',r $E ST,q7 /l. { I 11 APB 2[25 'EspArclr,(\ z }') .a' * t ?,\ I (t- dd

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.