Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
[ 3446l
sachdeva Metal works, Rep.by its partner Sh. Varpreet sinoh, S/o.s. Rai inder
Singh, aged about 59 ye_ars,- Ryo.ptot No. ai2, b"rrttimT iVigai, e"fr'il;L
Hyd era bad, Te la n gana-50'0092.
Between:
AND
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
.
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTIbE SUJOY PAUL
AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT PETITION NO: 8113 0F 2025
.....PETITIONER
1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by-its principal Secretary, Department of
Commercial Taxes, Telangana Secretariat at Hyderakiad.
2. Assistant Commissioner, (GST), Khairatabad, Somajiguda_ll Circle,
Punjagutta Division, Hydeiabad, Telangana.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be
pleased to issue an approprlate writ order or direction more particularly one in
the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents more
particularly the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order dated
30.04.2024 (Annexure P-'r2) whereby the Respondent No. 2 has confirmed the
demand of tax amounting to Rs.6,69,24,206t- for the Financiar year 2o1g-1g
under section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 being arbitrary, illegal, without jurisdiction
and in gross defiance to earlier order dated 06.o2.2o24 (Annexure p-10) passed
by the Respondent No. 2 for the period 2o1B-19 whereby the Respondent has
dropped the proceedings under section 73 of the GST Act, 2017 against the
petitioner initiated uncler similar set of facts and allegatio ns/discrepancies and
consequently set aside the impugned order dated 30 04'2024
|.A.NO:1 OF 2025
Petition Uncler section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in
the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
grant stay of all furtler proceedings pursuant to thq impugned order dated
30.04.2024 (Annexure P-12) whereby the Respondent No 2 has confirmed the
demand of tax amounting to Rs.6,69 ,24,2061- for the Financial Year 2018-19
underSectionT3o{theGSTAct,20lT,pendingdisposaloftheabovewrit
petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI M.S. BALASUBRAMANIUM
CounselfortheRespondents:SPEGIALGovTPLEADERFoRSTATETAx
The Court made-the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA trIRIT PETITION No. 8113 of 2O25 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog Paul) Sri M.Balasubramanium, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to the petitioner to file a properly constituted petition.
3.Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. //II .N. SRIHARI TANT REGISTRAR ASS To SA LS {4- SECTION OFFICER
3.Two CD Cop Rl M-S-BALASUBRAMANTUM, Advocate tOpUCl PECIAL Gow PLEADER ron siniE-iil, XI'J"""," topucl
HIGH COURT DATED:1910312025 ORDER WP.No.8113 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS. ,4 ,1 ..',r $E ST,q7 /l. { I 11 APB 2[25 'EspArclr,(\ z }') .a' * t ?,\ I (t- dd