M/S Selvel Media Services Private Limited And 11 Others vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others

WTAX/354/2018HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01047101201805 May 20192 pages
For Petitioner: Javed Husain Khan, Gulrez Khan, W.H., Khan, W.H. Khan
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the Nagar Nigam, Kanpur, ceased to have any jurisdiction to impose and realize tax on advertisement after September 12, 2016, and more specifically after July 1, 2017. The Court reasoned that the deletion of Section 172(2)(h) of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1916, by Section 173 of the U.P. GST Act, effective July 1, 2017, extinguished the statutory power to levy advertisement tax. Furthermore, the deletion of the State Government's legislative power concerning advertisement tax under Entry 55 of List II of the VII Schedule of the Constitution, effective September 12, 2016, meant there was no longer any legislative authority to enact laws for imposing such tax. The Court emphasized that Article 265 of the Constitution requires taxes to be levied only by the authority of law, and in this case, the authority was absent. Therefore, the demand for advertisement tax from the petitioners after July 1, 2017, was deemed illegal and without jurisdiction. The notices of demand were quashed to the extent they pertained to the period after July 1, 2017, and any tax deposited by the petitioners for this period was ordered to be refunded. The Court also directed that the Nagar Nigam shall not realize any tax on advertisement after July 1, 2017.

Facts

The petitioners, M/s Selvel Media Services Private Limited and 11 others, are advertising companies challenging the demand of advertisement tax imposed by the Nagar Nigam, Kanpur. They argue that the tax is illegal from July 1, 2017, onwards, as the provision for levying advertisement tax was deleted and the U.P. Goods and Services Tax, 2017 came into force. Previously, the Nagar Nigam's rules for advertisement tax were struck down by the Allahabad High Court. Despite subsequent bye-laws also being struck down and no further rules being enacted, the Nagar Nigam continued to raise demands for advertisement tax. The power to levy this tax was previously under Section 172(2)(h) of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1916, which was deleted effective July 1, 2017, by Section 173 of the U.P. GST Act. Furthermore, the State Government's legislative power under Entry 55 of List II of the VII Schedule of the Constitution was deleted effective September 12, 2016, by the Constitution (101 Amendment) Act, 2016.

Key Issues

1. Whether the Nagar Nigam, Kanpur, has the legal authority to levy and collect advertisement tax after September 12, 2016, and specifically after July 1, 2017, in light of the deletion of the relevant legislative provisions and the implementation of the U.P. GST Act, 2017? Petitioner's Arguments: The petitioners contended that the deletion of Section 172(2)(h) of the Municipal Corporation Act, 1916, by Section 173 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017, effective July 1, 2017, removed the statutory basis for levying advertisement tax. They also highlighted that the State Government's power to legislate on advertisement tax under Entry 55 of List II of the VII Schedule of the Constitution was deleted effective September 12, 2016, by the Constitution (101 Amendment) Act, 2016. Consequently, no law exists to authorize the imposition or collection of such tax. They relied on Article 265 of the Constitution, which mandates that taxes can only be levied by the authority of law. Respondent's Arguments: The judgment records no specific arguments made by the respondent (State of U.P. and Kanpur Nagar Nigam).

Sections Cited

Section 172(2)(h), Section 173, Section 2(h), Entry 55 of List II of the VII Schedule of the Constitution of India, Article 265

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 354 of 2018 Petitioner :- M/S Selvel Media Services Private Limited And 11 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Javed Husain Khan,Gulrez Khan,W.H.

Khan,W.H. Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J.

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.

Heard Sri W.H. Khan, Senior counsel assisted by Sri Javed Husain Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for the State of U.P., and Sri Alok Mishra, learned counsel for Kanpur Nagar Nigam.

The petitioners are all advertising companies. They are aggrieved by the demand of advertisement tax imposed by the Nagar Nigam, Kanpur on displaying advertisement through hording within its jurisdiction. Basically, the challenge is to the realization of the advertisement tax w.e.f. 1.7.2017 on the ground that from the said date, as the provision to levy advertisement tax has been deleted and the U.P. Goods and Service Tax, 2017 has come into force, no advertisement tax can be levied.

There is no dispute to the fact that previously Nagar Nigam Kanpur framed U.P. Municipal Corporation (Assessment and Collection of Tax on Advertisement)

Rules, 2009. Thes

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.