M/S Ishwar Singh Rathore vs. UOI And Others

CWP/8619/2024HC Himachal PradeshGSTCNR HPHC01037752202407 May 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court found that the impugned order was passed without considering the petitioner's reply and supporting documents. Consequently, the Court set aside the order and directed the competent authority to reconsider the petitioner's objections and documents.

Facts

The petitioner challenged demand orders passed under GST law, alleging procedural irregularities such as the non-issuance of mandatory notices before passing the orders. The petitioner also sought to challenge provisions related to Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim restrictions, but later withdrew this part of the prayer.

Key Issues

Whether the GST authorities followed mandatory procedural requirements, including issuing proper notices, before passing demand orders? Whether the petitioner's reply and documents were considered before passing the impugned order?

Sections Cited

Section 61, Section 73, Rule 99, Rule 142

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

2026:HHC:15348 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8619 of 2024 Date of decision: 07.05.2026 M/s Ishwar Singh Rathore.

...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. …Respondents. Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Sharma, Advocate.

For the respondents : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 & 3. : Mr. Vijay K. Arora, Senior Advocate with Ms. Godawari and Mr. Hitansh Raj, Advocates, for respondents No.2 & 4. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking following main substantial relief(s):- “(i) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order of demand dated 28.03.2024, passed by the Respondent No. 5, while conducting scrutiny under Section 61 of Centre Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, without issuing mandatory notice in Form ASMT 10 under Rule 99 of Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017. p

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Himachal Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.