Gjk Shellex INDIA Private Limited vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.
Original PDF →WPA/612/2025HC CalcuttaGSTCNR WBCHCA001063202505 March 2025Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY3 pages
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
M/L 22
05.03.2025
sb
Ct 5
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
WPA 612 of 2025
GJK Shellex India Private Limited
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Avra Mazumder
Ms. Alisha Das
Mr. Suman Bhowmik
Mr. Samrat Das
Ms. Elina Dey
Mr. Sourendra Nath Banerjee
… For the petitioner
Mr. A. Ray
Mr. T. M. Siddiqui, Sr. Advocate,
Mr. N. Chatterjee
Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty
Mr. D. Sahu
… For the State.
1. Challenging the appellate order dated 25th
November, 2024 passed under Section 107 of the
Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax
Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said
Act”) for the Financial Year 2019-2020, the
instant writ petition has been filed.
2. Having heard the learned advocates appearing
for the respective parties, it transpires that
initially a show cause notice was issued under
Section 74 of the said Act and accordingly on the
basis thereof an order under Section 74 of the
said Act was passed on 12th May, 2021.
Subsequently, the appellate authority while
2
hearing out the appeal by taking note of the
provisions contained in Section 74 and 73 of the
said Act was of the view that though the
petitioner had wrongly availed input tax credit
however, since it could not be established that
the availment of input tax credit was by reasons
of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression with
an intent to evade tax, the appellate authority
had
proceeded
to
hold
that
the
present
proceeding should be treated as a case within
the meaning of Section 73 of the said Act. It
further appears that the appellate authority
while
deciding
the
challenge
did
not
appropriately
take
note
of
the
provisions
contained in Section 16(2) and Section 16(5) of
the said Act and also failed to take note of the
returns filed by the petitioner in respect of the
period of dispute which falls in the Financial
Year 2019-2020 though the same had been filed
within the extended period as provided for in
Section 16(5) of the said Act.
3. Having regard thereto, I am inclined to remand
back the matter to the appellate authority with a
direction
upon
the
appellate
authority
to
reconsider the above appeal in the light of GSTR-
2A, a copy whereof has been placed before this
3
Court, and to decide the applicability of Section
16(5) of the said Act, having regard to the
returns filed by the petitioner within the
extended cutoff date as provided therein.
4. The matter is remanded back to the appellate
authority
for
passing
a
fresh
order. Consequentially, the order impugned shall not be given effect to till such time a fresh order is passed and upon passing of such order, the above order impugned shall form part of the order to be passed by the appellate authority.
5.
With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
6.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.
(Raja Basu Chowdhury, J.)
Reproduced from the public record of the Calcutta High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.