M/S.Ashirbad Agro Pr vs. Sales Tax Officer

WP(C)/21699/2012HC OrissaGSTCNR ODHC01000504201223 November 2021Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the STO correctly completed the assessment on the original return, as the revised return was not accepted by the department. Therefore, the penalty under Section 43(2) of the OVAT Act was leviable.

Facts

The petitioner availed Input Tax Credit (ITC) on construction materials, including purchases from unregistered dealers. After an inspection revealed discrepancies, the petitioner filed revised returns and paid the tax. However, the Sales Tax Officer (STO) completed the assessment on the original return and levied a penalty.

Key Issues

Whether the penalty under Section 43(2) of the OVAT Act is leviable when the assessment is completed on the original return despite the filing of a revised return and payment of tax. Whether the department is estopped from levying penalty if they accepted the revised return.

Sections Cited

Section 43(2), Section 33(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.21699 of 2012 M/s. Ashirbad Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. …. Petitioner Mr. T. K. Satpathy, Advocate -versus- Sales Tax Officer, Jajpur Circle, Jajpur …. Opposite Party Mr. Sunil Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE A. K. MOHAPATRA Order No.

ORDER 23.11.2021

04.

1. The challenge in the present petition is to an assessment order dated 31st August, 2012 passed by the Sales Tax Officer (STO), Jajpur Circle, Jajpur Road directing that the Petitioner has to pay Rs.8,28,703.70 or Rs.8,28,704/- as penalty.

2.

The facts in brief are that for the period 1st April, 2009 to 30th June, 2010, the Petitioner/dealer filed a return. In the meanwhile, The STO Vigilance, Cuttack Division inspected the dealer’s business premises on 22nd June, 2010 and submitted a report, which inter alia revealed that the dealer had availed Input Tax Credit

(ITC) on con

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.