M/S. P.K. Minings PVT.LTD., Bbsr vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court set aside the impugned adjudication order. It directed the petitioner to comply with a circular requiring an application for rectification, noting that time for such an application was still available.
Facts
The petitioner's claim for Input Tax Credit (ITC) was rejected as barred by limitation by an adjudication order. The petitioner approached the High Court instead of filing an appeal, citing a central notification extending time and a subsequent state ordinance.
Key Issues
Whether the petitioner's claim for ITC, rejected as time-barred, could be restored given subsequent notifications and ordinances, and the availability of a rectification process.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
Mr. Kar, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned in the writ petition
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.