M/S Birla Corporation Limited vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others

WTAX/749/2020HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01174987202006 December 202119 pages
For Petitioner: Sujeet Kumar, Chhaya GuptaFor Respondent: C.S.C., With, Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 766 of 2020, Petitioner :- M/S Birla Corporation Ltd., Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that Section 40(1) of the VAT Act, which deals with refunds, was not applicable to the trade tax refund as the dispute predated the VAT Act. Consequently, Section 40(2), providing for interest on delayed refunds, was also inapplicable.

Facts

The petitioner sought interest on delayed refund of trade tax granted under the VAT Act. The refund was adjusted against outstanding entry tax demands. The petitioner argued for interest under Section 40(2) of the VAT Act.

Key Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on the delayed refund of trade tax under the provisions of the VAT Act when the original dispute arose under the Erstwhile Act?

Sections Cited

Section 40(2), Section 40(1), Section 29

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 AFR Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 749 of 2020 Petitioner :- M/S Birla Corporation Limited Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar,Chhaya Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. With Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 766 of 2020 Petitioner :- M/S Birla Corporation Ltd. Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar,Chhaya Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. With Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 767 of 2020 Petitioner :- M/S Birla Corporation Ltd. Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar,Chhaya Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. And Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 768 of 2020 Petitioner :- M/S Birla Corporation Ltd. Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sujeet Kumar,Chhaya Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1.

Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Bagaria, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Sujeet Kumar and Ms. Chhaya Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel appearing for the revenue.

2.

By means of these four writ petitions, the petitioner has

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.