M/S. Sri Venkata Lakshmi Traders vs. Commercial Tax Officer

WP/20464/2019HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01042560201917 December 2019Bench: RAKESH KUMAR,A V SESHA SAI2 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the requirement to pay 12.5% of the disputed amount applies only when an order results in an admitted tax liability, which is not the case when a refund claim is rejected. The rejection of a refund claim does not create a tax demand.

Facts

The petitioner, a cement trader, claimed a refund of excess input tax credit. The Commercial Tax Officer rejected the refund, and the Appellate Deputy Commissioner upheld this rejection, stating the petitioner needed to pay 12.5% of the disputed amount.

Key Issues

Whether the Appellate Deputy Commissioner was correct in demanding 12.5% of the disputed amount for a rejected refund claim, and if such a demand is applicable in cases of refund claims.

Sections Cited

Section 31(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI

WRIT PETITION No.20464 of 2019

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice A.V.Sesha Sai) Heard Sri S.Dwarakanath, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes, appearing for the respondents.

2.

In the present Writ Petition, challenge is to the order passed by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Tirupathi, vide ADC Order No.4605/19-10-2019, dated 19.10.2019. 3. The petitioner herein is engaged in the business of trading in cement and is a registered dealer under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (for short, ‘the VAT Act’) on the rolls of the Commercial Tax Officer, Macherla Circle, Macherla. In the Value Added Tax return for the month of March, 2017, the petitioner herein made a claim before the Commercial Tax Officer, first respondent herein, for refund of Rs.23,77,446/- on the ground that the amount represents the excess input tax credit. The Commercial Tax Officer by virtue of an order bearing Ref.No.37939708123/2016-17, dated 04.07.2019, rejected the said request for refund. Aggrieved by the said or

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.