M/S Bhavani Medical Agencies vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

WP/16031/2020HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01024389202012 September 2022Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,A V RAVINDRA BABU6 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The High Court set aside the ex parte assessment order and remanded the matter back to the assessing authority. This was conditional upon the petitioner depositing 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks.

Facts

The petitioner, a dealer under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, challenged an ex parte best judgment audit assessment order. The petitioner claimed they could not submit objections due to short notice and the onset of the pandemic.

Key Issues

Whether the ex parte assessment order was passed in violation of natural justice due to insufficient time to respond amidst the pandemic. Whether the petitioner should be allowed to submit documents after the assessment.

Sections Cited

Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU

WRIT PETITION No.16031 of 2020

ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.Praveen Kumar)

Heard Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri S.A.V. Sai Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commercial Tax appearing for the respondents, and perused the record.

2.

The present writ petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:-

“…… to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in passing the Ex parte Best Judgment Audit Assessment Proceedings dated 18.03.2020 served on the petitioner on 20.03.2020 for the tax period 2015-16 to 2017-18 (up to June, 2017) under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, as arbitrary, contrary to law and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the Ex parte Best Judgment Audit Assessment Proceedings of the 1st respondent, dated 18.03.2020 and pass ……”

3.

The affidavit filed in support of the writ petition shows that the petitioner

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.