Venkateswara Electricals vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer-Iii

WP/11881/2019HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01026044201913 September 2022Bench: C.PRAVEEN KUMAR,A V RAVINDRA BABU4 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The High Court quashed the penalty order, noting that the appellate authority had already remanded the assessment order to the assessing authority for de-novo verification. The Court stated that recovery of penalty would not arise in this situation.

Facts

The petitioner challenged a penalty order for the tax periods 2014-15 to 2017-18, alleging violation of natural justice. The petitioner had failed to reply to a show cause notice regarding disallowance of Input Tax Credit (ITC).

Key Issues

Whether the penalty order was sustainable given the subsequent remand of the assessment order and alleged violation of principles of natural justice.

Sections Cited

Not explicitly mentioned in the provided text, but the context relates to assessment and penalty under VAT law.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.RAVINDRA BABU

WRIT PETITION No.11881 of 2019

ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.Praveen Kumar)

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes appearing for the respondents. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.

2.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:- “…… to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order or direction quashing the order of the 1st respondent dated 2.7.2019 in AO.No162644, imposing penalty of Rs.23,83,161/- for the tax period 2014-15 to 2017-18 (up to June, 2017) as illegal, arbitrary, whimsical, without jurisdiction and in violation of principles of natural justice and award exemplary costs against the 1st respondent and pass such other order or orders….”

3.

The averments in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition and the material on record would show that the 1st respondent, on an authorization by the Deputy Commissioner (CT), Visakhapatnam,

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.