M/S. Saraiwwalaa Agrr Refineries LTD. vs. The State Of Telangana
Held
The Court held that the petitioner's ground of challenge, which involved the disallowance of input tax credit (ITC) on exempt transactions and exempt sales, did not meet the criteria for bypassing the statutory remedy of appeal. The Court found that the case did not satisfy the parameters that would allow for the Writ Petition to be entertained directly. Therefore, the petitioner was directed to approach the first appellate authority. The Court noted that the Writ Petition was filed within the period of limitation for filing an appeal, considering the holiday on the last day. The period during which the Writ Petition was pending was directed to be excluded for the purpose of limitation. The Court dismissed the Writ Petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a statutory appeal on or before May 10, 2019, which would be treated as filed within the period of limitation.
Facts
The petitioner challenged an order of assessment passed under the Telangana VAT Act, 2005, by the Assessing Officer. The primary contention was the wrongful disallowance of input tax credit (ITC) on exempt transactions and exempt sales. The impugned order was dated March 2, 2019, and received by the petitioner on March 7, 2019. The last date for filing an appeal was April 7, 2019, which was a holiday. Consequently, the petitioner filed the Writ Petition on April 8, 2019, which was within the extended period of limitation for filing an appeal. The Writ Petition had been pending since then.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner's challenge to the disallowance of input tax credit (ITC) on exempt transactions and exempt sales under the Telangana VAT Act, 2005, warrants bypassing the statutory remedy of appeal, thereby justifying the entertainment of a Writ Petition. Petitioner's contention: The petitioner argued that the Assessing Officer had wrongly disallowed ITC on exempt transactions and exempt sales. Revenue's contention: The respondents, represented by the learned Special Standing Counsel, argued that the ground of challenge, concerning the disallowance of ITC on exempt sales, did not satisfy the parameters for bypassing the alternative remedy of appeal. They contended that the petitioner should pursue the statutory appeal process.
Sections Cited
Telangana VAT Act, 2005
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.7489 of 2019
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice V.Ramasubramanian)
Challenging an order of assessment passed under the Telangana VAT Act, 2005, the petitioner has come up with the above Writ Petition.
Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.T.Vinod Kumar, learned Special Standing Counsel for the respondents.
The main ground of challenge to the impugned order is that the Assessing Officer has wrongly disallowed the input tax credit, on the ground that the petitioner could not claim ITC on exempt transactions and exempt sales.
But, the above ground is no ground to allow the petitioner to come with a Writ Petition bypassing the alternative remedy of appeal. The alternative remedy of appeal can be allowed to be bypassed only on certain parameters. The case on hand does not satisfy the same. Therefore, the petitioner should go before the first appellate authority.
It appears that the impugned order had been passed on 02.03.2019 and it was received by the petitioner on 07.03.2019. The limitation for filing an appeal was t
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.