Steel Authority Of INDIA LTD.(Sail) vs. Primetals Technologies INDIA PVT. LTD. (Formerly Known As Siemens Vai Metals Technologies PVT.LTD)

O.M.P. (COMM)/349/2020HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01011906202012 March 2020Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI32 pages
For Petitioner: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Puneeth Ganapathy, Ms.Ishita Mathur, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr.P.C.Markanda, Sr.Adv with Mr.V.K.Sharma, Mr.Rajesh Markanda, Ms.Reema Soni, Advs
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The High Court reduced the awarded interest rate from 14% to 10% per annum, finding it unreasoned and excessive. It also reduced the awarded costs of arbitration to 50% of the actual costs, as agreed by the respondent.

Facts

Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) challenged an arbitral award that allowed claims of Primetals Technologies India Pvt. Ltd. The dispute arose from a contract for a steel plant project, specifically concerning CENVAT credit shortfalls and reimbursement of Central Sales Tax (CST).

Key Issues

Whether the arbitral award on interest and costs was justified and reasonable, considering the grounds for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

Sections Cited

Section 34

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

OMP(COMM)349/2020

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:- 12.03.2020

+ O.M.P. (COMM) 349/2020 & I.As 1862-64/2020

STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD.(SAIL) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Puneeth Ganapathy, Ms.Ishita Mathur, Advs.

versus

PRIMETALS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIEMENS VAI METALS TECHNOLOGIES PVT.LTD) ..... Respondent Through: Mr.P.C.Markanda, Sr.Adv with Mr.V.K.Sharma, Mr.Rajesh Markanda, Ms.Reema Soni, Advs.

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL)

1.

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Steel Authority of India Limited, who was the respondent before the learned Arbitrator, assails the arbitral award dated 15.10.2019 whereunder the claims of the respondent have been allowed with actual costs of arbitration and interest @ 14% per annum.

2.

The brief facts as emerge from the record are that the Digitally OMP(COMM)349/2020

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.