Sharwan Kumar And Sons vs. Union Of INDIA Ors And

W.P.(C)/7425/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01034421202514 September 2026Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Akhil Gupta, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Akash Verma, SSC, CBIC
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that entertaining the writ petition would not be appropriate given the existence of an alternative remedy of appeal. The petitioner's plea of a duplicate demand can be raised before the Appellate Authority.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an Order-in-Original and a subsequent DRC-07, alleging a duplicated demand. The impugned order was a common order passed against 670 noticees for availing ineligible Input Tax Credit based on goods-less invoices and fake firms.

Key Issues

Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternative remedy of appeal is available, especially in cases involving common orders and multiple parties. Whether the petitioner's plea of a duplicated demand can be considered by the Appellate Authority.

Sections Cited

Section 14

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010344212025 + W.P.(C) 7425/2025 & CM APPL. 33267/2025 SHARWAN KUMAR AND SONS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Gupta, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA ORS AND .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akash Verma, SSC, CBIC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

O R D E R %

14.09.

2026

1.

The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned Order-in-Original dated 04th February, 2025 with DRC-07 on 13th February, 2025 on the ground that the demand raised vide the impugned order has been duplicated.

2.

A common order has been passed against as many as 670 noticee(s). It has been found that on the basis on goods-less invoices ineligible Input Tax Credit has been availed by constituting fake firms.

3.

The Petitioner has a remedy of appeal against the impugned order passed on 04.02.2025. However, learned Counsel representing the Petitioner submits that a duplicate demand has been raised by way of the present impugned order and against the previous order dated 29.01.2025, the Petition

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.