The Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax And Central Excise vs. M/S Dufflaghur Tea Estate

C.Ex.App./77/2018HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01000054201718 July 2018Bench: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE,HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ACHINTYA MALLA BUJOR BARUA7 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court allowed the prayer of the petitioner, the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, to withdraw the appeals. The Court's decision was based on the petitioner's submission that the withdrawal was in light of specific circulars issued by the Ministry of Finance. The reasoning was that the petitioner, as the appellant, had the right to withdraw its appeals, especially when supported by departmental circulars. Consequently, the Court dismissed all the appeals as withdrawn. No specific legal provisions were discussed in detail, but the decision was driven by administrative directives (circulars) and the appellant's right to withdraw.

Facts

These are a batch of appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise, Dibrugarh, against various tea estates, including M/s Arun Tea Estate, M/s Phulbari Tea Estate, and others. The appeals were filed before the Gauhati High Court. The specific tax periods and the exact nature of the dispute or the orders under challenge are not detailed in the provided excerpt. However, the appeals were listed for hearing before the High Court.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise should be allowed to be withdrawn. The petitioner, the Commissioner, through its learned counsel, Mr. B. Sarmah, sought permission to withdraw these appeals. The grounds for withdrawal were based on a circular dated 11.07.2018, read in conjunction with an earlier circular dated 17.08.2011, issued by the Ministry of Finance Department and Revenue Central Board Excise and Customs. The Court had to decide whether to grant this prayer for withdrawal. No arguments were recorded for the respondents (the tea estates).

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Page No.# 1/7 GAHC010162152017

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : C.Ex.App. 69/2018 1:THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS and SERVICES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MILAN NAGAR, LANE F, P.O. C.R. BUILDING, DIBRUGARH 786003

VERSUS 1:M/S ARUN TEA ESTATE P.O. DHEKIAJULI, DIST. SONITPUR, ASSAM, PIN 784110

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : C.Ex.App. 70/2018 1:THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS and SERVICES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MILAN NAGAR LANE F P.O. C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH 786003 VERSUS 1:M/S PHULBARI TEA ESTATE MCLOED RUSSEL INDIA LIMITED PS AND PO BALIPARA DIST SONITPUR ASSAM

Page No.# 2/7 784101

Advocate for the Petitioner : SC CENTRAL EXCISE CUSTOMS Advocate for the Respondent : Linked Case : C.Ex.App. 77/2018 1:THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS and SERVICES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE MILAN NAGAR LANE F P.O. C.R. BUILDING DIBRUGARH-786003 VERSUS 1:M/S DUFFLAGHUR TEA ESTATE (MCLEOD RUSSEL INDIA LTD.) P.O. HELEM DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM PIN 784170

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B SAR

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.