M/S A.K. Ghosh And Co. vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 Ors.

WP(C)/2483/2020HC GauhatiGSTCNR GAHC01008307202005 November 2020Bench: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA4 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The reasoning was based on the explicit instruction from the petitioner to their counsel not to press the matter further. The Standing Counsel for the Goods and Service Tax Department stated they had no objection to this course of action. Therefore, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds of withdrawal. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were discussed in relation to the merits of the case, as the petition was withdrawn.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s A.K. Ghosh and Co., represented by its sole proprietor Sri Anil Kumar Ghosh, filed a writ petition before the Gauhati High Court. The respondents were the Union of India and various GST authorities, including the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Joint Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, and Superintendent (Recovery). The specific tax period and the exact amount in dispute are not recorded in the judgment. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is also not detailed, other than the filing of the petition itself.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the writ petition. This issue arises from the petitioner's instruction to their counsel not to press the petition further and to seek permission to withdraw it. The petitioner argued for withdrawal. The respondent, representing the Goods and Service Tax Department, had no objection to the withdrawal.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

WP(C)/2483/2020
WP(C)/2466/2020

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010083072020

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2483/2020 M/S A.K. GHOSH AND CO. REP. BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR SRI ANIL KUMAR GHOSH, S/O. LT. UPENDRA CHANDRA GHOSH, R/O. DIGBOI, NEAR GOURANGA MANDIR TINALI, P.O. DIGBOI, PIN-786171, DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM.

VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPTT. OF REVENUE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX Age: 0 Occupation :

3:JOINT COMMISSIONER Age: 0 Occupation :

4:THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER Age: 0 Occupation :

5:THE SUPERINTENDENT (RECOVERY) Age: 0 Occupation Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M BHATTACHARJEE

Page No.# 2/4 Advocate for the Respondent : SC, GST Linked Case : WP(C)/2466/2020 M/S. S. AHMED AND CO. Age: 0 Occupation : Address:REP. BY ITS SOLE PROP MR.. SAMSUDDIN AHMED S/O- S AHMED R/O- MASJID LANE MULIABARI P.O- DIGBOI PIN- 786171 DIST- TINSUKIA VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Age: 0 Occupation : Address:REP. BY THE SECR

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Gauhati High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.