M/S. Shree Motors (Proprietor Pradeep Choudhary) vs. Union Of INDIA

CW/4315/2019HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC01017098201921 November 2019Bench: DINESH MEHTA3 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court held that the writ petition was disposed of in terms of the judgment in Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. The Court directed that the respondents shall permit the petitioner to submit the online GST TRAN-1 form, provided the petitioner furnishes proof of a prior attempt to upload the form before December 27, 2017, which failed due to a technical fault on the common portal. The petitioner is also required to obtain a certificate or recommendation from the GST Council in this regard. If the three requirements outlined in paragraph 12 of the Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. judgment are met, the petitioner's online GST TRAN-1 form shall be accepted if filed by December 31, 2019, or any extended period. The petitioner must apply to the GST Council for the requisite certificate within 15 days, providing evidence. The GST Council shall issue the recommendation within three weeks if the petitioner's assertion is found correct. If the GST Council deems the petitioner not entitled, it must pass a reasoned order and communicate it to the petitioner, who is then free to pursue appropriate remedies.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Motors, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court challenging an action or order by the revenue authorities. The petitioner sought to submit the GST TRAN-1 form. The respondents, including the Union of India and the GST Council, submitted that the case was covered by a previous decision of the Court in Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. The petitioner agreed that the issue was in principle covered but sought further directions for clarity. The Court considered the arguments and issued specific directions regarding the submission of the GST TRAN-1 form.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to submit the online GST TRAN-1 form, and under what conditions? This issue turns on the interpretation and application of the Court's previous judgment in Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors. and the procedural requirements for filing the TRAN-1 form. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that while the core issue was covered by the precedent, specific directions were necessary to avoid difficulties in submitting the TRAN-1 form. Respondents' Contention: The respondents contended that the case was squarely covered by the decision in Jodhpur Truck Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India & Ors., implying that the petitioner should follow the established procedure outlined in that judgment.

Sections Cited

None explicitly mentioned in the provided text, but the context implies discussions around provisions related to the filing of GST TRAN-1 forms and the procedural mechanisms for rectifying technical glitches.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4315/2019 M/s. Shree Motors (Proprietor Pradeep Choudhary), Having Principal Place Of Business At 170, Rajiv Nagar, Basni, Jodhpur (Rajasthan) - 342004. Aged About 42 Years. ----Petitioner Versus

1.

Union Of India, Ministry Of Finance (Department Of Revenue) Room No. 46, North Block, New Delhi - 110001 Through Joint Secretary (Revenue).

2.

The Goods And Service Tax Council (GST Council), Office Of The GST Council Secretariat, 5th Tower II, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi - 110001 Through Its Secretary.

3.

Goods And Services Tax Network (GSTN), Through Its CEO, East Wing, Worldmark 1, 4th Floor, Tower B, Aerocity, New Delhi - 110037

4.

Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Custom, Through Its Chairman, Department Of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi - 110001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prateek Gattani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajvendra Saraswat Mr. Anil Bhansali Mr. Akshat Verma Mr. Sanjeet Purohit JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Order 21/11/2019 Mr. Saraswat, learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2, submits that the case is squarely covered by a decision of this

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.