M/S. Allinone Hax (Opc) PVT. LTD. vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court held that since the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to withdraw the instant writ petition, the petition should be dismissed as withdrawn. The reasoning is straightforward: a party has the right to withdraw their case if they no longer wish to pursue it. The Court acknowledged the petitioner's request and acted upon it. The ratio decidendi is that a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request. No specific findings on the merits of any GST-related issue were made, as the case was disposed of on procedural grounds. No issues were expressly left undecided.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s. Allinone Hax (Opc) Pvt. Ltd., through its authorized signatory Naresh Yadav, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur. The respondents include the Union of India, the State of Rajasthan, and various GST authorities. The specific tax period(s) and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to this filing is not recorded.
Key Issues
The primary issue before the Court was whether to grant the relief sought by the petitioner in the writ petition. The petitioner, through their learned counsel, sought to withdraw the instant petition. The respondents, represented by their counsel, did not appear to contest the withdrawal. The Court had to decide whether to permit the withdrawal of the petition and consequently dismiss it. No specific legal provisions or precedents were argued by either side as the matter was concluded by the petitioner's request for withdrawal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
[2024:RJ-JP:50741-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9292/2024 M/s. Allinone Hax (Opc) Pvt. Ltd., C/o Mishri Devi, Sainthal Road, Dausa, Rajasthan Through Its Authorized Signatory Naresh Yadav S/o. Sh. G P Yadav ----Petitioner Versus
Union Of India, Through Finance Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of India, New Delhi
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Finance Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariate, Jaipur
The Principal Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, A Block, Surya Nagar, Alwar
The Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax, A Block, Surya Nagar, Alwar
The Principal Additional Director General, The Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax Intelligence Gurugram Zonal Unit, 3Rd Floor, Plot No. 44, Sector-32, Opposite Medanta Hospital, Gurugram-122001 (Haryana) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Paridhi Jain on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Ghiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kinshuk Jain with Mr. Sourabh Jain Mr. Devesh Yadav on behalf of Mr. RD Rastogi, ASG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 10/12/2024
Le
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.