Raj Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Das Gupta vs. The Joint Commissioner

CW/13458/2025HC RajasthanGSTCNR RJHC02068509202508 October 2025Bench: SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA,BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU2 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the writ petition. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned orders, if such an appeal were to be filed. The Court stipulated that if an appeal is filed, it should be filed within a period of one month from the date of the order. Furthermore, the Court directed that any such appeal, if filed, shall be considered and decided within a period of six months thereafter. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted.

Facts

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Gupta, proprietor of M/s Goyal Savitri Industries, filed a writ petition before the Rajasthan High Court at Jaipur. The petition challenged certain orders passed by the revenue authorities. The respondents included the Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Circle-C Zone-III, Jaipur, the Union of India, the State of Rajasthan, and the Goods and Services Tax Council. The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition.

Key Issues

The primary issue was whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner's counsel prayed for withdrawal with liberty to assail the impugned orders in appeal. The court had to decide whether to grant this liberty and dismiss the petition as withdrawn. The petitioner argued for withdrawal to pursue an alternative remedy, while the respondents' stance on the withdrawal request is not explicitly recorded in the provided text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

[2025:RJ-JP:40842-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13458/2025 Raj Kumar Gupta S/o Ram Das Gupta, Aged About 58 Years, Proprietor Of M/s Goyal Savitri Industries, Having Its Principal Place Of Business At 8A, Tanwar Colony, Khatipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302020 ----Petitioner Versus

1.

The Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Circle-C Zone-III, Jaipur, Commercial Taxes Department, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur 302004

2.

Union Of India, Through Its Secretary (Revenue), Ministry Government Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, Government Of India, North Block, New Delhi

3.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Finance Secretary (Revenue), Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, 1st Floor, Main Building, Government Secretariat, Janpath, Jaipur- 302005

4.

Goods And Services Tax Council, Through Revenue Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of India, 5th Floor, Tower II, Jeevan Bharti Building, Janpath Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi-110001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Bapna with Mr. Utkarsh Mishra Ms. Tanushka Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devesh Yadav, through VC HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR.

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.