M/S Shaik Enterprises vs. Deputy Commissioner Of State Tax

WP/6755/2025HC Andhra PradeshGSTCNR APHC01012620202508 September 2026Bench: NINALA JAYASURYA,T.C.D.SEKHAR4 pages
For Petitioner: J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR, Counsel f
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court noted that Rule 86A(3) of the GST Rules stipulates that a restriction on an Electronic Credit Ledger ceases to have effect after one year. Since the blocking order was dated 02.12.2024, the restriction had expired by the time of the judgment.

Facts

The petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger was blocked by the authorities. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging this action, arguing it violated principles of natural justice and was taken without sufficient grounds.

Key Issues

Whether the blocking of the petitioner's Electronic Credit Ledger was justified and if the restriction had expired by operation of law.

Sections Cited

Rule 86A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

APHC010126202025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] WEDNESDAY, THE 9th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6755 OF 2025 Between:

1.

M/S SHAIK ENTERPRISES, REPRESENTED BY THE PROPRIETOR SRI SHAIK NAYAZ AHAMAD FLAT N 17/131, R.S.ROAD, NEAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE, TANAKAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH PIN 515571

...PETITIONER AND 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, SPECIAL CIRCLE: ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAMU DIVISION, ANANTAPURAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, PIN 515001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, SPECIAL CIRCLE ANANTAPURAM, ANANTAPURAMU DIVISION, ANANTAPURAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. PIN 515001. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, HINDUPUR CIRCLE, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN 515001. 4. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF A.P. REVENUE (CT) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENTOF A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, MANGALAGIRI MANDAL, GUNTUR (DISTRICT), AP, PIN -522 503. ...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.

J.N VENKATA SURESH KUMAR Counsel f

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.