Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Commissionerate vs. M/S Dsm Sugar

CEXAD/19/2019HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01064510201930 October 20191 pages
For Respondent: Diptiman Singh, Hon'ble Bharati Sapru, J., Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J., Heard Ms. Anjana Singh, learned counsel for the, appellant and Shri Diptiman Singh, learned

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Court No. - 35 Case :- CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 19 of 2019 Appellant :- Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Commissionerate Respondent :- M/S Dsm Sugar Counsel for Appellant :- Anjana Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Diptiman Singh Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

Heard Ms. Anjana Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

Ms. Anjana Singh, learned counsel for the department states that the tax effect involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.1,00,00,000/-.

This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular of Ministry of Finance dated 22.08.2019 as modified by F.N.390 /Misc. /116 /2017 -JC/, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell).

Order Date :- 31.10.2019 pks

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.