M/S Libra International Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Commercial Tax And Another

WTAX/665/2020HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01140671202001 December 20206 pages
For Petitioner: ­ Suyash Agarwal
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the challenge to the order dated 15.02.2018 is barred by laches due to the belated stage of filing the writ petition. This is further supported by the petitioner's claim of having deposited the entire tax and penalty, which, under Section 129(5) of the Act, deems all proceedings in respect of the notice to be concluded. Regarding the GST DRC-07 dated 18.09.2020, the Court observed that if the petitioner has indeed made the full payment of tax and penalty, they should submit proof of payment to the concerned authority and apply for rectification or withdrawal of the order. The Court did not explicitly decide on the validity of the DRC-07 itself but provided a procedural recourse for the petitioner.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Libra International Limited, filed a writ petition challenging two orders. The first order, dated 15.02.2018, was passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Commercial Tax, under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017, demanding tax of Rs. 1,01,844/- and an equivalent penalty of Rs. 1,01,844/-, totaling Rs. 2,03,688/-. This order arose from the interception of the petitioner's goods and vehicle on 11.02.2018 for alleged transportation without an E-Way Bill. The petitioner claims to have deposited the tax and penalty amount via demand draft on 14.02.2018. However, the petitioner later received a GST DRC-07 dated 18.09.2020, detailing the demand under Section 129 of the Act, which prompted the filing of this writ petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the challenge to the order dated 15.02.2018 passed under Section 129(3) of the UPGST Act, 2017, is maintainable at this stage, considering the delay and the petitioner's claim of payment? The petitioner argued that they have deposited the tax and penalty, and despite this, a subsequent demand notice was issued. The respondent contended that the order dated 15.02.2018 has attained finality and the writ petition is barred by laches. The respondent also argued that as per Section 138(5) of the Act, all proceedings are deemed concluded upon payment. 2. Whether the GST DRC-07 dated 18.09.2020, which reflects the demand, can be quashed? The petitioner sought to quash this order. The respondent suggested that if the petitioner has indeed made the payment, they should apply for rectification or withdrawal of the order uploaded in FORM GST DRC-07 by providing proof of payment.

Sections Cited

Section 129, Section 138, Rule 142, Section 161

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1 A.F.R. Court No. ­ 5 Case :­ WRIT TAX No. ­ 665 of 2020 Petitioner :­ M/S Libra International Limited Respondent :­ Assistant Commissioner Commercial Tax And Another Counsel for Petitioner :­ Suyash Agarwal Counsel for Respondent :­ C.S.C.,A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.

1.

Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for respondent no.1. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for following reliefs :­ "I.   Issue   a   writ,   order   or   direction   in   the   nature   of   Certiorari quashing the order no.731 dated 15.2.2018 passed by Respondent no.1 u/s 129(3) of the UPGST Act (Annexure No. 6) II Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing GST DRC­07 dated 18.9.2020 (Annexure­9) III.   Issue   any   other   writ,   order   or   direction   in   favour   of   the petitioner   which   this   Hon'ble   Court   deems   fit   in   the   facts   and circumstances of the case. IV. Award cost of the petition to the petitioner."

3.

Pleadings  of  the   writ   petition   indicate  that   the   goods and vehicle   of   the   petitioner   were

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.