Vikas Agarwal vs. Union Of INDIA And 2 Others
Facts
A complaint was filed on August 18, 2021, under Section 132 of the CGST Act, 2017, against the applicant, Vikas Agarwal, and three co-accused. They are alleged to have issued tax invoices to bogus firms, resulting in the evasion of government revenue amounting to Rs. 32.56 Crores. The Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Agra, authorized the arrest of these individuals, who were subsequently arrested on August 18, 2021, and have been in jail since. The applicant contends he is innocent, falsely implicated, and not a partner of the co-accused. He notes that no search was conducted at his premises and that the proprietor of M/s Agrawal Trading Company, Rishab Mittal, who has been granted bail, was involved in the iron scrap business. The applicant also highlights that co-accused Varun Gupta has also been granted bail.
Held
The Court allowed the bail application of the applicant, Vikas Agarwal. The decision was based on the principle of parity, noting that co-accused Rishab Mittal and Varun Gupta had already been granted bail by the High Court after considering the facts and law. The Court found the applicant's case to be on similar footing and therefore entitled to the same benefit. While allowing the bail, the Court explicitly stated that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The applicant was directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to five specific conditions aimed at ensuring his cooperation with the trial and preventing any misuse of liberty or interference with evidence or witnesses. The Court also stipulated that in case of breach of any condition, the prosecution would be at liberty to move for bail cancellation.
Key Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to be released on bail, considering his alleged involvement as a mastermind in GST evasion of Rs. 32.56 Crores, and the arguments presented by both sides. The applicant argued that he is innocent, falsely implicated, and has no connection to the alleged offense. He emphasized that no search was conducted at his premises and that co-accused Rishab Mittal and Varun Gupta have already been granted bail by this Court, making his case identical and similar. He also stated he has no criminal history and will cooperate with the trial if released. The revenue (Union of India and others, represented by CGST & Central Excise) opposed the bail application, asserting that the applicant is the mastermind behind the GST evasion of Rs. 32.56 Crores and has raised objections in their counter-affidavit, thus not being entitled to bail.
Sections Cited
Section 132
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Court No. - 75 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44016 of 2021 Applicant :- Vikas Agarwal Opposite Party :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Pratap Singh,Azad Khan,Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.S.G.I.,Manoj Kumar Singh,Parv Agarwal Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
Heard Sri Ashish Deep Verma, learned Advocate assisted by Sri Azad Khan, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Krishna Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for C.G.S.T. & Central Excise and perused the record.
Facts in brief are that a complaint was filed under Section 132 of C.G.S.T. Act, 2017 on 18.8.2021 against the applicant and three other co-accused persons, namely, Varun Gupta, Rishab Mittal and Sunil Kumar Rathore, having issued tax invoices to bogus firms. The applicant and co-accused persons are said to have committed theft/evasion of Government Revenue to the tune of Rs. 32.56 Crores. The Commissioner, C.G.S.T. and Central Excise, Agra authorized Inspector Satish Kumar Singh to arrest the aforesaid persons who arrested them on 18.8.2021 and since then they are in jail.
Learned counsel for applicant argued that he is innocent and has been fals
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.