Ramjani vs. State Of U P And 2 Others
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
impugned order. Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 15 WRIT TAX No. - 1612 of 2022 Through :- Mr. Aloke Kumar, Advocate
v/s Through :- Mr. Ankur Agarwal, Standing Counsel for respondents No. 1, 2 and 3 CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE J.J. MUNIR, JUDGE Ramjani .....Petitioner State of U.P. and others .....Respondents
After hearing learned counsel for the parties, in our opinion, the petitioner should avail his remedy of appeal against the order impugned as he has failed to respond to the show cause notice issued to him.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail of his statutory remedy of appeal. Allahabad 06.01.2023 Deepak/Ishan Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No 2 WTAX No. 1612 of 2022 (J.J. Munir) Judge (Rajesh Bindal) Chief Justice DEEPAK KUMAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.