M/S. Shri Ram Industries Private Limited vs. State Of U.P. And Another

WTAX/1365/2023HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01262154202330 November 20231 pages
For Petitioner: Praveen Kumar
AI SummaryRemanded

Held

The Court found that the show cause notice for cancellation of registration was deficient as it did not provide a date for the petitioner's appearance. The Court reasoned that a proper opportunity to be heard is a fundamental aspect of natural justice, and the absence of a specific date for appearance renders the notice procedurally flawed. Therefore, the Court directed the petitioner to file their reply within seven days from the date of the order. The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, was directed to hear the matter on December 11, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. and decide the case expeditiously, serving a copy of the decision upon the petitioner within eight days. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.

Facts

M/s. Shri Ram Industries Private Limited (the petitioner) filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a show cause notice dated September 28, 2023, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax (the respondent revenue authority). The notice proposed the cancellation of the petitioner's GST registration under Section 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act. The petitioner contended that the show cause notice did not specify a date for their appearance. The Court noted this deficiency in the notice.

Key Issues

1. Whether the show cause notice dated September 28, 2023, for cancellation of registration under Section 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act is legally sustainable given the absence of a specified date for the petitioner's appearance? The petitioner argued that the notice was defective due to the lack of a hearing date, which violates principles of natural justice. The respondent revenue authority did not record any specific arguments in the judgment.

Sections Cited

Section 29

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1365 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S. Shri Ram Industries Private Limited Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to amend the description of the petitioner during the course of the day.

2.

Registry is also directed to correct the name of the petitioner in its computer records.

3.

In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the show cause notice dated September 28, 2023 for cancellation of his registration under section 29 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act.

4.

Upon perusal of the said notice, it is clear that no date has been provided for appearance of the petitioner.

5.

Accordingly, we direct the petitioner to file his reply within seven days from the date and the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax is directed to hear the matter on 11.12.2023 at 11.00 a.m. and decide the same expeditiously upon passing an order and serve a copy of the same upon the petitioner within eight days.

6.

With these observations and directions, the writ petition is dispos

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.