Sanyog Construction Private Limited vs. The State Of Bihar
Held
The Court accepted the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions from the petitioner, that the petitioner would deposit the admitted amount towards tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, and also a sum equal to 10% of the remaining amount of tax in dispute. This undertaking was accepted and taken on record. The Court also accepted the statement of the learned Standing Counsel for the State, who confirmed that if the petitioner complies with this undertaking, the concerned authority will allow the petitioner access to upload the statutory appeal on the GST Web Portal as required under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court directed that this be done positively within a period of four weeks from the date of the order. Furthermore, if the petitioner complies with this undertaking within the stipulated four weeks, the appellate authority was directed to hear the appeal through virtual mode, considering the circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic, and decide it expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of its filing. The petition was disposed of in these terms.
Facts
Sanyog Construction Private Limited (the petitioner) filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging an assessment order dated May 30, 2019/August 30, 2019, passed under Section 62 of the GST Act, 2017, by the Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes, North Circle, Patna. This order resulted in a demand of Rs. 7,09,946.71, communicated via DRC-07 dated September 2, 2019. The petitioner sought permission to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act on the web portal without depositing the pre-requisite 10% of the disputed amount, which was Rs. 70,796/-. Alternatively, they requested a direction for the Commissioner of State Taxes to decide their application dated March 5, 2020, on merits. The tax period in dispute is May 2019.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, without depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount as a pre-requisite for uploading the appeal on the GST web portal? The petitioner argued that they should be allowed to file the appeal by depositing the admitted tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, along with 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount. They sought a direction to the respondent authorities to permit them to upload the statutory appeal on the GST web portal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, without adjusting the full 10% of the assessed/disputed amount. The petitioner also sought to prevent recovery of the disputed amount until the appeal was filed. Alternatively, they prayed for a direction to the Commissioner of State Taxes to decide their pending application on merit. The revenue, represented by the State of Bihar through the Commissioner State Taxes and other authorities, contended that if the petitioner deposits the admitted tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, along with 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount, the concerned authority would allow access for uploading the statutory appeal on the GST Web Portal as required under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017.
Sections Cited
Section 107, Section 62
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7202 of 2020 ====================================================== Sanyog Construction Private Limited, A Company registered under Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at 202 ABC Abu Maliya Building, Naya Tola, Patna through its authorized signatory/Director Sri Ujjwal Pratap Singh, Son of Sri Ramji Singh, aged about 42 years (Male), Resident of House No. 15 E, Road No. 12, Rajendra Nagar, Patna-800016. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
The State of Bihar through the Commissioner State Taxes, Bihar, Patna.
The Commissioner State Taxes, Bihar, Patna.
The Joint Commissioner of State Tax, North Circle, Patna.
The Deputy Commissioner State Taxes, North Circle, Patna, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chiranjiva Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, SC-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 27-08-2020 P
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.