Sanyog Construction Private Limited vs. The State Of Bihar
Held
The Court accepted the statement made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, under instructions, that the Petitioner would deposit the admitted amount towards tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, and also a sum equal to 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount. The Court also accepted the undertaking that the Petitioner would fully cooperate and not seek unnecessary adjournments. In response, the State's counsel stated that upon such deposit, the concerned authority would permit the Petitioner to upload the statutory appeal on the GST web portal as required under Section 107 of the GST Act. The Court directed that this be done positively within four weeks. Furthermore, if the Petitioner complied with this undertaking within the stipulated period, the appellate authority was directed to hear the appeal through virtual mode due to the COVID-19 pandemic and decide it expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of filing. The petition was disposed of in these terms.
Facts
Sanyog Construction Private Limited (the Petitioner) challenged an assessment order dated May 30, 2019/August 30, 2019, passed under Section 62 of the GST Act, 2017, by the Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes, North Circle, Patna (Respondent No. 4). This order demanded a total of Rs. 6,97,817.64 for the month of June 2019, as communicated via DRC-07 dated September 2, 2019. The Petitioner sought to file a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act but was facing issues with the GST web portal, specifically regarding the pre-requisite of depositing 10% of the disputed tax amount, which was Rs. 69,782/-. The Petitioner also sought to prevent recovery of the disputed amount during the pendency of the appeal and, alternatively, requested a direction for the Commissioner of State Taxes to decide their application dated March 5, 2020, on merits.
Key Issues
1. Whether the Petitioner should be permitted to file/upload a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017, on the GST web portal without depositing the pre-requisite 10% of the disputed tax amount of Rs. 69,782/-, arising from the assessment order dated 30.05.2019/30.8.2019 passed under Section 62 of the GST Act, 2017, which resulted in a demand of Rs. 6,97,817.64. Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner argued that they should be allowed to file the appeal by depositing the admitted tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, along with 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount, and be permitted to upload it on the GST portal as required by Section 107 of the GST Act. They also sought to prevent recovery of the disputed amount until the appeal was filed and requested that their pending application be decided on merit. Revenue's Contention: The State submitted that if the Petitioner deposits the admitted tax, interest, fine, fee, and penalty, along with 10% of the remaining disputed tax amount, the concerned authority would allow access for uploading the statutory appeal on the GST web portal as per Section 107 of the GST Act.
Sections Cited
Section 107, Section 62
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7197 of 2020 ====================================================== Sanyog Construction Private Limited A Company registered under Companies Act, 1956, having its registered office at 202 ABC Abu Maliya Building, Naya Tola, Patna through its authorized Signatory/ Director Sri Ujjwal Pratap Singh, Son of Sri Ramji Singh, aged about 42 years (Male), Resident of House No. 15 E, Road No.12, Rajendra Nagar, Patna- 800016. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
The State of Bihar through the Commissioner State Taxes, Bihar, Patna.
The Commissioner State Taxes, Bihar, Patna.
The Joint Commissioner of State Tax, North Circle, Patna.
The Deputy Commissioner State Taxes, North Circle, Patna, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chiranjiva Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vikash Kumar, S.C.-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 27-08-2020
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.