M/S Champion Group Of Company vs. The State Of Bihar
Held
The Court held that the order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central Circle, cancelling the petitioner's GST registration, was liable to be quashed. The Court found that the order was non-speaking, cryptic, and passed without affording the petitioner a proper opportunity to file a reply and be heard, thus violating the principles of natural justice. The Court noted that the cancellation order entailed civil and penal consequences, and the authority failed to refer to the show cause notice or the petitioner's response. The Court also acknowledged the petitioner's request for condonation of delay due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Consequently, the Court quashed the cancellation order and directed the restoration of the petitioner's registration. The Court further directed the Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, to finalize the petitioner's assessment or pass appropriate orders in accordance with the law. The issue of delay in filing returns was expressly stated to remain closed and not be raised again by the respondents.
Facts
The petitioner, M/s Champion Group of Company, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26.11.2022 by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeals), Patna, which rejected their application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration. The petitioner also sought to quash an ex-parte order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central Circle, cancelling their GST registration. The cancellation order was issued without giving the petitioner a proper opportunity to file a reply or be heard. The petitioner's registration was cancelled under Section 29 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The petitioner had applied for registration, which was granted, but due to the Covid-19 pandemic, they faced delays in their work and subsequently in filing returns. The petitioner requested condonation of delay, which was not granted.
Key Issues
1. Whether the order dated 07.09.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Patna Central Circle, cancelling the petitioner's GST registration, is liable to be quashed for violation of principles of natural justice, specifically for lack of proper opportunity to file a reply and be heard, as contemplated under Section 29 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017? Petitioner's Arguments: The petitioner argued that the cancellation order was ex-parte, non-speaking, and cryptic, failing to refer to any show-cause notice or response thereto. This violated the principles of natural justice, leading to civil and penal consequences. They contended that the authority ought to have considered their request for condonation of delay in filing returns, especially given the circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic. Revenue's Arguments: The revenue, represented by Mr. Vikash Kumar (SC 11), did not present any arguments against the petitioner's claims regarding the procedural irregularities and violation of natural justice. The judgment notes that the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents stated that the issue of delay in filing returns would remain closed and not be raised again.
Sections Cited
Section 29
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17500 of 2022 ====================================================== M/s Champion Group of Company 3rd Floor, Divya Lok Complex, East Boring Canal Road, Patna through its Proprietor Amit Kumar Singh, Aged about 44 years, Gender Male, son of Rameshwar Singh, Resident of House No. 161, Patliputra Colony, P.S. Patliputra, District- Patna- 800013. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Department of State Taxes, Government of Bihar, Patna.
The Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeals), Patna West Division, Patna.
The Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Patna Central Circle, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Alok Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Vikash Kumar (SC 11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon’ble the Chief Justice/Hon’ble Judges
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.