M/S Kundan Kumar vs. The State Of Bihar
Original PDF →Facts
The petitioner, M/s Kundan Kumar (Civil and Electrical Contractor), filed a writ petition (C.W.J.C. No. 12913 of 2024) before the Patna High Court. The current proceeding is a Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case (MJC No. 2814 of 2025) initiated for alleged non-compliance with the order passed by the High Court in the previous writ petition on April 11, 2025. The petitioner claims that the grievance raised in the original writ petition has now been redressed, and the order of the Court has been complied with by the opposite parties, who include officials from the State of Bihar and the Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Ltd.
Held
The Court noted the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner stated that the order previously passed by the High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12913 of 2024 on April 11, 2025, has been complied with, and the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Based on this submission from the petitioner, the Court found that the purpose of the current proceedings, which were initiated due to alleged non-compliance, has been fulfilled. Therefore, the Court decided to close the contempt proceedings. The ratio decidendi is that once a petitioner confirms compliance with a previous court order, the contempt proceedings initiated for non-compliance are to be closed.
Key Issues
1. Whether the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12913 of 2024 dated 11.04.2025 has been complied with by the opposite parties, thereby redressing the grievance of the petitioner? Petitioner's Contention: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order passed by the High Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12913 of 2024 dated 11.04.2025 has been complied with, and the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. No specific provisions of the GST Act or any other law were explicitly argued in relation to the compliance, but the submission implies adherence to the court's previous directive. Revenue/State's Contention: The judgment does not record any specific arguments from the opposite parties regarding the compliance or non-compliance with the previous order. The proceeding is based on the petitioner's submission of compliance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER 5 18-03-2026 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12913 of 2024 dated 11.04.2025 have been complied with and the grievance of the petitioner has been Patna High Court MJC No.2814 of 2025(5) dt.18-03-2026 2/2 redressed.
Having regard to the same, the contempt stands closed.
Gauravkr/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.