M/S Powertech Engineers, A Partneship Firm vs. The State Of Bihar
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 2 19-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned G.P.-7 for the State.
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ application with liberty to prefer Second Appeal as provided
Patna High Court CWJC No.3227 of 2026(2) dt.19-06-2026 2/2 under Section 112 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax/Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. Learned G.P.-7 has no objection to the same.
In the circumstances, we allow learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ application with liberty to prefer the Second Appeal within a period of 60 days from today.
This Court has been informed that the Tribunal has already been constituted and it is likely to start functioning very soon. We expect that immediately after the Tribunal starts functioning, the appeal, if any, preferred by the petitioner be taken up for consideration.
In the meantime, if the petitioner deposits total 20% of the impugned demand (10% already deposited with the Appellate Authority), the respondent authority shall not take any coercive action against the petitioner to realise the impugned demand.
This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.
Abhishek/- (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) ( Kumar Manish, J) U
Reproduced from the public record of the Patna High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.