Nemarugommula Swarna vs. Assistant Commissioner (St)

Original PDF →
WP/19702/2024HC TelanganaGSTCNR HBHC01037874202409 April 2025Bench: SUJOY PAUL,RENUKA YARA4 pages
For Petitioner: SRI SIDDARTH GILDA, REPRESENTII{G, SRI S. VIJAY ADITHYAFor Respondent: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR', DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENER/\L OF INDIA, Gounsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M.P.KASHYAP

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE ACTTNG CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND .-THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PET]TION NO: 19702 OF 2024 [ 3446 ] S. N. New Between: Nemarugommula Swarna Swarna Electricals and Shayampet, Hanamkonda , W/o: Suresh, Age 58 years, proprietor of M/ Contractors, 22-6-25011 , Hunier Road, AND ...PET|TIONER 1. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Warangal_Urban 1, Warangal, Telangana. 2. state of relangana, Rep, by qts chief secretary and speciar chief Secretary to covemment (FAC), State Tax Department, Seiretiliii ny,i"iiOri.'"*' 3. U_nion of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of tnota, Jro Ftoor, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi_l .10 001 . 4. cenkal Board of rndirect raxes and cusloms, GST poricy wing, Government of lndia. Ministry of Finance, New Derhi, nep.'oy its coriri..ioii"i(c6ii. " ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction (a) declare Notification No. 09i2023-central rax dated 311312023 and Notification No.56/2023-central rax dated 2gt12t2023 issued by the 4rh Respondent under section 168-A of the central Goods and services Tax Act, 20'17 and G.o.Ms.No.118 dated 2s.o8.2023 and G.o.Ms.No.170 dated 3011212023 issued by the 2nd Respondent under section 16g-4 of the Telangana Goods and services Tax Act, 20'r7 extending the rimitation for concruding the adjudication of show cause notice issued under section 73 for the tax period lir-, b ;.+:. -r-:.- rs:- ,./2o1a-fitll3ot4l2o24aSu|tra-ViresSection168-AoftheCentralGoodsand ServicesTaxAct,20..landaSultra-ViresSectionl6S-AoftheTeli'lnganaGoods andServicesTaxAct20lTalsomanifestlyarbitraryandviolativ>Articlel4of theConstitution,(brset-asideimpugnedOrder23tO4t2024:rrlongwithits attachment dated 15104/2 024 and proceedings in Form GST DRO-07 vide Ref No. 2D360424047266D dated 23104t2o24 issued by the 1St Respondent for the taxperiod2olS-lga,rdasillegal,arbitrary,beyondtime'inViolati(nofprinciples of natural justice for rrot providing an opportunity for personal hr:aring, and (c) consequently,declar:thatthePetitionerisentitledtoclaiminputtaxcreditina sum of Rs.19,81 ,484/- claimed in Form GSTR-3B filed for tre tax period Ivlarch,2019 though il was filed on O911212019' IA NO:1 OF 2024 p Petition under :section 151 CPC praying that in the circun stances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court ma) be pleased to grant stay of all furtl err proceedings pursuant to the impugned Or jer 2310412024 alongwithitsattachrnentdaledl5t4l2O24andproceedingsinFtrrmGSTDRC- 07 vide Ref.No.Zt)360 424O47266D dated 23t4t2O24 issueC by the 1St Respondentforthetaxperiod20l8-lgpendingdisposalofthe''VritPetitionas otherwise the Petitioner will be put to severe loss and hardship Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIDDARTH GILDA, REPRESENTII{G SRI S. VIJAY ADITHYA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: SRI T' CHAITANYA KlllAN' NEPNESETTIUG SFi SWAROOP OORILLA SPECIAL GOVT PLE/\DER FOR STATE TAX Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR' DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENER/\L OF INDIA Gounsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI M.P.KASHYAP

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE IION'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA WRIT PETITION No.l97O2 of 2O24 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Cttief Justice Sujog paul) Sri Siddarth Gilda, learned counsel , representing Sri Vijay Adithya, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw this petition with the liberty to the petitioner to hle p afresh, if occasion arises

2.

Sri T.Chaitanya Kiran, learned counsel representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos.1 and 2, has no objection.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for. No order as to costs. _ _Y':$l:::ogg !9!!!ions pen{lng, rj q15:!q1! q!q$ sr.".q4 .V.KAVITHA DE UTY REGISTRAR //// ECTION OFFICER To, 'l . One CC to Sri S. Viiav Adithva. Advocate IOPUCI

2.

Two CC to The Spe;iit Ce frjr State Tax, H'igh Coirrt - Telangana, at Hyderabad[OUTJ

3.

One CC to SRl. M.P.Kashyap Advocate tOpUCl

4.

One CC to Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, Defuty Soiicitor

5.

Two CD Copies for the State of General of lndia TJ LS

HIGH COURT DATED:0910412025 ORDER oF 1E(4ry (P .$ G\ irltli .) r) ' ilJ ri *+ 5s c .)^ \ q ott{ * o WP.No.1970?. of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITI{DRAWN WITHOUT COSTS Tc I t I l i l I I i I :t: i i I t I I I I I I t_?

Reproduced from the public record of the Telangana High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.