Rajesh Projects (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs. Goods And Services Tax Network & Anr.

W.P.(C)/8590/2018HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01199962201826 November 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Adv
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that the petitioner's claim in the writ petition had been rendered infructuous. This was based on a statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent, who, upon instruction, informed the Court that CBIC notification no. 48/2018 dated 10.09.2018 had permitted the petitioner to file GST TRAN-1. The Court accepted this submission and took on record an e-mail addressed to the Revenue's counsel confirming this development. Consequently, no further adjudication on the merits of the petitioner's original grievance was required.

Facts

The petitioner, Rajesh Projects (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an action or order by the revenue authorities concerning GST. The specific nature of the challenge and the tax period(s) involved are not detailed in the judgment. The procedural history that led to the writ petition is also not elaborated upon. The core of the matter, as presented in the order, revolves around the petitioner's inability to file GST TRAN-1.

Key Issues

The primary issue before the Court was whether the petitioner was permitted to file GST TRAN-1. The petitioner's contention, implied by the filing of the writ petition, was that they were unable to file the form. The respondent's argument, as presented by their counsel, was that a subsequent notification from the CBIC had addressed this issue. The Court had to decide if the petitioner's grievance had been resolved by this administrative action. The specific provisions of GST law or rules that were the subject of the dispute are not explicitly mentioned.

Sections Cited

GST TRAN-1

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8590/2018 & CM APPL. 32963/2018 RAJESH PROJECTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. versus GOODS AND SERVICES TAX NETWORK & ANR...... Respondents Through: Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Joshi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R %

26.11.

2018

Learned counsel for the respondent states upon instruction that by CBIC notification (notification no. 48/2018 dated 10.09.2018), the petitioner has now been permitted to file GST TRAN-1. In these circumstances, the claim in the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

A copy of the e-mail addressed to the Revenue’s counsel is hereby taken on record.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

PRATEEK JALAN, J NOVEMBER 26, 2018/„pv‟ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/06/2026 at 21:33:57

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.