Bharat Transport Corp. PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax

W.P.(C)/2187/2019HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01013146201906 March 2019Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN2 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari & Mr. Ramashish, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Rudrakshi Deo & Ms. Hafsa Khan, Advs
AI SummaryWithdrawn

Held

The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. It was held that if the petitioner files an appeal against the impugned order dated February 8, 2019, within 10 days from March 6, 2019, the designated officer (Appellate Authority) shall dispose of the appeal expeditiously. This disposal should occur within six weeks from the date of the order, after affording a proper hearing to both parties. The Court also noted that it was open for the petitioner to apply for a waiver from the requirement of full deposit, and in such an event, the appellate authority would pass an appropriate order after hearing the parties. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty granted.

Facts

The petitioner, Bharat Transport Corp. Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging an order passed by an adjudicating and enforcement officer dated February 8, 2019. The respondent was the Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax. The petitioner sought to challenge this order. After some hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that they had instructions to withdraw the writ petition. The petitioner intended to approach the concerned Additional Commissioner, who functions as the Appellate Authority, to file an appeal against the impugned order.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner should be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to pursue an appeal before the Appellate Authority? The petitioner argued that they wished to withdraw the writ petition to file an appeal with the Additional Commissioner, who is the designated Appellate Authority. They sought liberty to do so. The petitioner also indicated an intention to apply for a waiver of the requirement for full deposit of the disputed amount. The revenue or State did not present any arguments as the matter was resolved by the petitioner's decision to withdraw.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2187/2019 BHARAT TRANSPORT CORP. PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Jain, Mr. Virag Tiwari & Mr. Ramashish, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Shadan Farasat, ASC, GNCTD with Ms. Rudrakshi Deo & Ms. Hafsa Khan, Advs. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R %

06.03.

2019

CM Appl. 10284/2019 (exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 2187/2019 & CM Appl. Nos. 10283/2019

After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the writ petition and approach the concerned Additional Commissioner i.e. the Appellate Authority. In case, the petitioner files an appeal against the impugned order of the adjudicating and enforcement officer, dated 08.02.2019 within 10 days from today, the W.P.(C) 2187/2019 designated officer shall dispose of the appeal expeditiously, after affording a proper hearing to the parties within

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.