Ms Ads Spirits Private Limited And Anr.. & Anr. vs. The Commissioner Of Trade And Tax Department & Anr.

W.P.(C)/8236/2020HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01028654202020 October 2020Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA4 pages
For Petitioner: Mr.Praveen Kumar with Mr.Rajiv Agnihotri, Ms.Babita Sant and Ms.Sunaina Kumar, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr.Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD. % Date of Decision: 20th October, 2020
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Held

The Court held that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending. Consequently, the Court directed Respondent No. 2 to allow the amendment sought by the petitioner in its return for Assessment Year 2017-18. However, this direction was made subject to the outcome of the Civil Appeals pending before the Supreme Court, and the direction would abide by the Supreme Court's final decision. The Court did not explicitly decide on the legality of the refusal to issue Form F but provided a conditional relief based on the pending Supreme Court matters. The issue of whether the assessing authority can refuse to issue Form F was implicitly addressed by allowing the amendment, albeit conditionally.

Facts

The petitioners, MS ADS SPIRITS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated July 1, 2020, by Respondent No. 2, which rejected their application for rectification of Form F for the Assessment Year 2017-18. The petitioners sought a direction to issue Form F for May 2017 to March 2018 and to prohibit coercive actions. They had inadvertently mentioned their entire stock as procured from Haryana when it was from both Punjab and Haryana, leading to an incorrect aggregate Form F. They requested correction on February 19, 2020. A previous writ petition (WP(C) No. 874 of 2020) challenging the rejection was dismissed by the Supreme Court on September 7, 2020, with liberty to pursue other remedies.

Key Issues

1. Whether the assessing authority can refuse to issue Form 'F' when the petitioner is otherwise entitled to it, considering there is no specific provision in the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, or Central Sales Tax (Delhi) Rules, 2005, for such refusal? (Question of law) Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that the assessing authority has no legal provision to refuse the issuance of Form 'F', making the order arbitrary and liable for quashing. They relied on this Court's decision in M/s. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner DT&T & Anr., W.P. (C) No. 8272/2015. Respondent's Contention: The respondent pointed out that the decision in M/s. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd. is under challenge before the Supreme Court. They further submitted that similar decisions of this Court have been appealed, and the Supreme Court has stayed their operation. In similar matters, this Court has either adjourned cases or allowed petitions but suspended relief pending the Supreme Court's decision on the civil appeals.

Sections Cited

Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Central Sales Tax (Delhi) Rules, 2005

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
W.P (C) No.8236/2020 Page 1 of 4 $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C) 8236/2020 & C.M.Nos.26695-26696/2020 MS ADS SPIRITS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Praveen Kumar with Mr.Rajiv Agnihotri, Ms.Babita Sant and Ms.Sunaina Kumar, Advocates. versus THE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAX DEPARTMENT & ANR. ...... Respondents Through: Mr.Satyakam, ASC for GNCTD. % Date of Decision: 20th October, 2020 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN, J: (Oral)

1.

The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing.

2.

Present writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 1 s t July, 2020 whereby respondent no.2 has rejected petitioner’s application for rectification of Form F for Assessment Year 2017-18. Petitioners further seek a direction to the

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.