Lord Krishna Traders Private Limited vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax

W.P.(C)/7110/2022HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01017523202227 July 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr Rajesh Jain, Mr Virag Tiwari, Mr Ramashish and Mr Rajeev Jain, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Mr Satyakam, ASC with Mr Alok Raj, Advocate
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that since the petitioner stated that the refund has been received, the writ petition could be closed. The Court ordered accordingly. The reasoning is based solely on the petitioner's submission regarding the receipt of the refund. No specific provisions of the GST Act or Rules were discussed or relied upon in reaching this decision. The operative direction was to close the writ petition and consign the case papers to record.

Facts

The petitioner, Lord Krishna Traders Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The respondent was the Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax. The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the writ petition. The amount in dispute is not mentioned.

Key Issues

The Court had to decide whether the writ petition should be closed. The petitioner argued that since the refund has been received, the writ petition can be closed. The respondent's arguments are not recorded in the judgment.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7110/2022 LORD KRISHNA TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Jain, Mr Virag Tiwari, Mr Ramashish and Mr Rajeev Jain, Advocates versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr Satyakam, ASC with Mr Alok Raj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MS JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R %

27.07.

2022 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]

1.

Mr Rajesh Jain who appears on behalf of the petitioner, says that since refund has been received insofar as this writ petition is concerned, the same can be closed.

2.

It is ordered accordingly.

3.

The case papers shall stand consigned to record.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J JULY 27, 2022/rhc

Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/06/2026 at 18:06:37

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.