Arien Sales & Marketing vs. Commissioner Of Trade & Taxes

W.P.(C)/13337/2018HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01515272201801 September 2022Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER,HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU5 pages
For Petitioner: Mr Rajesh Jain with Mr Virag Tiwari and Mr Ramashish, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr Shadan Farasat, ASC with Mr Bharat Gupta, Adv
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that once an assessment has been carried out under the CST Act, the jurisdiction of the officer under the DVAT Act to impose tax on such transactions is ousted. Consequently, the impugned orders were quashed.

Facts

The petitioner challenged assessment orders that revisited earlier assessments made under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The petitioner argued that once an assessment was made under the CST Act, the assessing officer under the DVAT Act could not re-assess the same period.

Key Issues

Whether the DVAT officer can re-assess turnover for periods already assessed under the CST Act, and if Section 7 of the DVAT Act bars such re-assessment.

Sections Cited

Section 7, Section 9(2), Section 32, Section 74A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Heard together (2 matters)

W.P.(C) 13336/2018
W.P.(C) 13337/2018

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO : 2022/DHC/004909

W.P.(C) 13336-37/2018 $~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI %

Date of Decision: 01.09.2022 + W.P.(C) 13336/2018 + W.P.(C) 13337/2018

ARIEN SALES & MARKETING

..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rajesh Jain with Mr Virag Tiwari and Mr Ramashish, Advs.

versus

COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES ..... Respondent Through: Mr Shadan Farasat, ASC with Mr Bharat Gupta, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

HON'BLE MS JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

1.

These writ petitions have been directed against the orders dated 05.10.2018, passed by the respondent/revenue.

2.

To be noted, notice in the instant petitions was issued on 11.12.2018. 2. 1. On the said date, an interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner/assessee, to the effect that no coercive action will be initiated against it, till the next date of hearing.

3.

The record shows that after a preliminary heari

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.