Oriel Financial Solution Private Limited vs. Icici Bank

Original PDF →
OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)/257/2024HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01082159202403 April 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH1 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

Facts

The petitioner, Oriel Financial Solution Private Limited (Decree Holder), had a dispute with the respondent, ICICI Bank (Judgment Debtor). The Judgment Debtor has handed over a Demand Draft for Rs. 5,10,962/- to satisfy the decree holder's dues. Both parties have agreed that this payment settles all outstanding amounts payable to the decree holder. The Court noted that in terms of Section 34(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the judgment debtor is obligated to issue the required credit notes within four weeks from the date of the order. The execution proceedings were disposed of as satisfied based on these terms.

Held

The Court held that the execution of the decree is satisfied upon the judgment debtor's payment of Rs. 5,10,962/- to the decree holder. The Court further directed that the judgment debtor shall issue the required credit notes within four weeks from the date of the order, in compliance with Section 34(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The reasoning is based on the mutual agreement of the parties that the payment extinguishes all dues. The ratio decidendi is that once the parties agree to a settlement amount and the issuance of consequential credit notes as per statutory requirements, the execution proceedings can be considered satisfied. The operative direction is the disposal of the execution as satisfied, with a specific timeline for issuing credit notes.

Key Issues

1. Whether the execution of the decree is satisfied upon the payment of Rs. 5,10,962/- by the judgment debtor to the decree holder, considering the provisions of Section 34(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner, as the decree holder, has agreed that the payment of Rs. 5,10,962/- settles all their dues. Respondent's Contention: The respondent, as the judgment debtor, has made the payment and is agreeable to issuing the required credit notes within the stipulated time as per Section 34(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, thereby satisfying the decree.

Sections Cited

Section 34(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 257/2024 ORIEL FINANCIAL SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED .....Decree Holder Through: Appearance not given versus ICICI BANK .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Sumil Goel, Ms. Sreeparna Basak, Ms. Apurba Pattanayak, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R % 03.04.2025

1.

The judgment-debtor has handed over a DD No. 510391 dated 02.04.2025 drawn on ICICI Bank for a sum of Rs. 5,10,962/-.

2.

The parties are agreeable that on payment of the said amount, there are no other dues payable to the decree-holder.

3.

However, in terms of Section 34(2) of Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017, the judgment-debtor shall issue required credit notes within 4 weeks from today.

4.

With these directions, the execution is disposed of as having been satisfied. JASMEET SINGH, J APRIL 3, 2025/DM Click here to check corrigendum, if any This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 16:14:41

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.