Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Gurugram vs. M/S Bharti Infratel LTD

Original PDF →
CEAC/8/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01032271202511 August 2025Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC with Mr. Ritwik Saha and Mr. Akhil Sharma, AdvsFor Respondent: Mr. Yogendra Aldak and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advs
AI SummaryDismissed

Facts

The Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Gurugram (Petitioner) filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court against M/s Bharti Infratel Ltd (Respondent). The specific tax period and the order or action under challenge, as well as the authority that passed it, are not detailed in the provided judgment excerpt. The amount in dispute is also not mentioned. The procedural history leading to this appeal is not elaborated upon, other than the fact that an appeal was filed by the Petitioner.

Held

The Court allowed the Petitioner's request to withdraw the appeal. The Petitioner's counsel stated they had instructions to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a fresh appeal. The Court, in its order, dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with liberty granted in accordance with law. No specific reasoning beyond acknowledging the request and granting the liberty was provided, as the matter was settled by consent. The Court did not delve into the merits of any underlying GST dispute or the validity of any specific provision. The operative direction was the dismissal of the appeal as withdrawn with liberty.

Key Issues

The Court was not required to decide any substantive issues of law or fact. The primary matter before the Court was the Petitioner's request to withdraw the appeal. The Petitioner, represented by Mr. Aditya Singla, sought liberty to file a fresh appeal. The Respondent, represented by Mr. Yogendra Aldak and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, did not appear to contest the withdrawal. Therefore, the only 'issue' was whether the appeal should be permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty sought by the Petitioner.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CEAC 8/2025, CM APPL. 31531/2025, CM APPL. 31533/2025, CM APPL. 31534/2025 COMMISSIONER CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX GURUGRAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC with Mr. Ritwik Saha and Mr. Akhil Sharma, Advs. versus M/S BHARTI INFRATEL LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yogendra Aldak and Mr. Kunal Kapoor, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR

O R D E R %

11.08.

2025

1.

Mr. Singla states he has instructions to withdraw the appeal with liberty to enable the appellant to file a fresh appeal.

2.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty in accordance with law.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

VINOD KUMAR, J AUGUST 11, 2025 cd

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/08/2025 at 11:44:31

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.