Hectafine Alusystems INDIA LTD vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax Delhi West & Anr.
Original PDF →Facts
The Petitioner, HECTAFINE ALUSYSTEMS INDIA LTD, challenged a communication dated March 5, 2020, issued by the Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax, Delhi West & Anr. This communication rejected the Petitioner's application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The Petitioner's counsel, on a previous date, sought instructions regarding the continuation of the matter due to subsequent developments. Today, the Petitioner's counsel informed the Court of their wish to withdraw the present petition.
Held
The Court did not decide any issues on merits. The Petitioner's counsel informed the Court of their wish to withdraw the present petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. It was explicitly stated that none of the contentions on merits were considered by the Court. The operative direction was to dismiss the petition as withdrawn and dispose of all pending applications.
Key Issues
1. Whether the rejection of the Petitioner's application under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, was valid? (Question of law) Petitioner's Contention: The Petitioner sought to challenge the rejection of their application under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. However, the specific grounds for challenging the rejection were not detailed as the matter was withdrawn before arguments on merits. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue's contentions were not recorded as the Petitioner withdrew the petition before any substantive arguments were made by either side.
Sections Cited
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R % 28.08.2025
This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
The challenge in this case was to the communication dated 5th March, 2020 by which the application of the Petitioner was rejected under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. 3. On the last date i.e., 31st July, 2025 it was submitted by the ld. Counsel for the Petitioner that he wishes to seek instructions if he wants to pursue the matter or not in view of the subsequent developments.
Today, ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that he wishes to withdraw the present petition.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is made clear that none of the contentions on merits have been considered by this Court. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 12:15:27
All pending applications, if any, are disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 28, 2025 Rahul/msh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/09/2025 at 12:15:27
Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.