Atik International Vision PVT. LTD. Through Its Director Sapna Sahni vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax

Original PDF →
W.P.(C)/7606/2025HC DelhiGSTCNR DLHC01035030202503 November 2025Bench: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN1 pages
For Petitioner: Mr. Ramashish, Mr. Rishabh Jain, AdvsFor Respondent: Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Adv. for Ms. Urvi Mohan, Panel Counsel for GNCTD
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The Petitioner, ATIK INTERNATIONAL VISION PVT. LTD., through its Director Sapna Sahni, filed a writ petition before the Delhi High Court. The Respondent is the Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax. The specific order or action under challenge and the tax period(s) are not detailed in the provided text. The procedural history indicates that the matter has reached the High Court, and a statement has been made by the petitioner's counsel regarding compliance with an order. The amount in dispute is not mentioned.

Held

The Court noted that the order in question has been complied with, as stated by the counsel for the petitioner. Based on this statement of compliance, the Court concluded that no further orders are required in the matter. The reasoning is solely predicated on the petitioner's counsel's assertion of compliance. The specific details of the order that was complied with, the nature of the compliance, or the original dispute are not elaborated upon. The Court's decision is limited to acknowledging the compliance and closing the proceedings.

Key Issues

The provided text does not contain any explicit statement of the issues the Court had to decide, nor does it record the arguments made by either the petitioner or the respondent. Consequently, the specific questions of law or fact, the relevant provisions of the GST Act or Rules, and any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon by the parties are not discernible from the given judgment excerpt. The court's decision appears to be based on a statement of compliance made by the petitioner.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7606/2025 ATIK INTERNATIONAL VISION PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SAPNA SAHNI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramashish, Mr. Rishabh Jain, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX .....Respondent Through: Ms. Priyanka Jindal, Adv. for Ms. Urvi Mohan, Panel Counsel for GNCTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

O R D E R %

26.05.

2026

1.

The order stands complied with, as statement to that effect is made by the counsel for the petitioner.

2.

No further orders are required. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AJAY DIGPAUL, J MAY 26, 2026/DM/ST This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 12:20:22

Reproduced from the public record of the Delhi High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.