M/S. Das Agencies, Chatrapur vs. Addl. Commnr Of State Tax (Appeal) Territorial Range , Ganjam
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 21.08.2024 ura, learned advocate appears on behalf o here was demand made by the State au of Goods and Services Tax. His clien rejected. Being aggrieved by the appellat o challenge the same but there is n is client’s prayer is actually for adju ppellate order, by which he is aggrieved moved this Court. K Petitioner ted by Adv.- U.C. Behura, Advocate Opp.Parties ted by Adv.- Mohanty, Sr. ing Counsel
of petitioner uthority for nt preferred te order, his no Tribunal udication of . Therefore,
He subm dated 16th Feb batch of writ pe (M/s. Maa Tar
Mr. Moh appears on beh writ petition sta
The first liberty to partie upon constitutio so within time p be free to proce
The writ Tarini Traders
Radha/Gs
mits, relief sought by his client is covere bruary, 2024 made by the first Division etitions, lead case being W.P.(C) no.420 rini Traders). hanty, learned advocate, Senior Standin half of the department. He does not disp ands covered. Division Bench directed a quantum of d es inasmuch as, petitioner could avail of on of the Tribunal and in event petitioner provided upon reconstitution, the departm eed. petition is disposed of as covered by s (supra).
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge ed by order n Bench in a 015 of 2023 ng Counsel pute that the deposit with f its remedy does not do ment would y M/s. Maa
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.