M/S. Maa Samleswari Transport And Multi Purpose Co-Operative Society LTD., Jharsuguda vs. The Chief Commnr. Of CT And GST, Cuttack
Original PDF →No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
ORDER 21.08.2024 hanty, learned advocate appears on submits, there was demand made by hort payment of Goods and Services Tax al. It was rejected. Being aggrieved by th nt wants to challenge the same but t oning. His client’s prayer is actually for a K Petitioner ted by Adv.- P. Mohanty, Advocate Opp. Parties ted by Adv.- . Das, Addl. ing Counsel
behalf of y the State x. His client he appellate there is no adjudication
of challenge t Therefore, his c
He subm dated 16th Feb batch of writ pe (M/s. Maa Tar
Mr. Das appears on beh writ petition sta
The first liberty to partie upon constitutio within time pro free to proceed.
The writ peti Traders (supra
Radha/Gs to appellate order, by which he is client has moved this Court. mits, relief sought by his client is covere bruary, 2024 made by the first Division etitions, lead case being W.P.(C) no.420 rini Traders). , learned advocate, Additional Standin half of the department. He does not disp ands covered. Division Bench directed a quantum of d es inasmuch as, petitioner could avail of on of the Tribunal and in event it does ovided upon reconstitution, the departmen
ition is disposed of as covered by M/s. M a).
(Arindam Sinha)
Judge
(M.S. Sahoo)
Judge aggrieved. ed by order Bench in a 015 of 2023 ng Counsel pute that the deposit with f its remedy s not do so nt would be Maa Tarini
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.