M/S. Aditya Craft And Papers Private Limited vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs (CBIC), Deptt. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance
Held
The Court directed an extension of time for the petitioner to file a reply to the SCN. The revenue authority will proceed according to law upon receiving the reply, otherwise, the SCN will be treated as unreplied.
Facts
The petitioner received a demand-cum-show cause notice (SCN) under Section 74 of the CGST Act, 2017, based on an audit report. The petitioner argued that the matter was for reconciliation and that no fraud or wilful misstatement occurred, and has since filed GSTR-9C. The petitioner had not filed a reply to the SCN.
Key Issues
Whether the SCN issued under Section 74 was premature without allowing for reconciliation, and if the petitioner should be granted an opportunity to reply to the SCN.
Sections Cited
Section 74
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
Mr. Parida, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, impugned is demand-cum-show cause notice (SCN) dated 19th July, 2024, said to be issued under section 74 in Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Information obtained for purp
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.