M/S Pradhan Industries, Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court extended the time for the petitioner to file a reply to the show cause notice. The proper officer was directed to inform the decision taken within four weeks of receiving the reply.
Facts
The petitioner paid compensation for dealing with forest land, which the revenue cited as a taxable service under the CGST Act. The petitioner argued that payment of compensation is not a taxable service. A show cause notice was issued, and the petitioner sought interference from the High Court.
Key Issues
The primary issue was whether the payment of compensation for dealing with forest land constitutes a taxable service under the CGST Act. The court also addressed the timeline for replying to a show cause notice.
Sections Cited
Schedule II, clause (e), entry 5
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
2024
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Orissa High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.