M/S Ramesh Chand Kannu Mal vs. State Of Up And 2 Others

WTAX/583/2018HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01064724201804 April 201812 pages
For Petitioner: ­ Nishant Mishra
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court held that the TDF was not required under the law after February 1, 2018, and that the goods were subject to IGST, indicating no intention to evade tax. Therefore, the seizure and consequential notice were illegal.

Facts

The petitioner's goods and vehicle were seized for allegedly not carrying a Transit Declaration Form (TDF) during inter-state transport. The petitioner argued that the TDF was not legally required after a certain date and that IGST had already been paid.

Key Issues

Whether the seizure of goods for non-compliance with a rescinded notification requiring a Transit Declaration Form was valid, and whether the circular issued by the Commissioner was ultra vires.

Sections Cited

Section 129, Section 168, Rule 138

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

1

A.F.R. Court No. ­ 32 Case :­ WRIT TAX No. ­ 583 of 2018 Petitioner :­ M/S Ramesh Chand Kannu Mal Respondent :­ State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :­ Nishant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :­ C.S.C. Hon'ble Krishna Murari,J. Hon'ble Ashok Kumar,J. (Per: Hon'ble Ashok Kumar, J.)

1.

Heard   Sri   Nishant   Mishra   assisted   by   Sri   Vipin   Kushwaha, learned   counsel   for   the   petitioner   and   Sri   C.B.   Tripathi,   learned Standing Counsel for the respondents­State.

2.

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, writ petition is finally disposed of without calling the counter affidavit.

3.

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following relief; A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned seizure order dated 28.03.2018 and consequential notice dated 28.03.2018. (Annexure­1 & 2) passed by respondent no.3 B.   Issue   a   writ,   order   or   direction   in   the   nature   of   mandamus commanding Respondent No.3 and his agents, to release the Vehicle No. UP­12AT­1460,   without   insisting   for   deposit   of   any   amount   of tax/penalty; C. Issue a writ, order

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.