Commissioner Of CGST And Central Excise vs. M/S Vinayak Ultra Flex PVT. LTD.

CEXA/18/2018HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01002776201804 February 20191 pages
For Respondent: Gopal Verma, Hon'ble Bharati Sapru, J., Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal, J., Heard Shri B.K. Singh Raghuvanshi, learned

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Court No. - 35 Case :- CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No. - 18 of 2018 Appellant :- Commissioner Of Cgst And Central Excise Respondent :- M/S Vinayak Ultra Flex Pvt. Ltd.

Counsel for Appellant :- B.K.Singh Raghuvanshi Counsel for Respondent :- Gopal Verma Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J.

Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.

Heard Shri B.K. Singh Raghuvanshi, learned counsel for the appellant and Shri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the respondent - assessee.

Learned counsel for the Department states that the tax effect involved in this appeal is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/-.

This appeal is, therefore, dismissed as not maintainable in view of the Circular of Ministry of Finance dated 11.07.2018, as modified by F.N.390 /Misc. /116 /2017 -JC/, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (Judicial Cell).

Order Date :- 5.2.2019 SY

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.