M/S Rewati Traders vs. Union Of INDIA And 4 Others

WTAX/773/2021HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01144070202122 September 20211 pages
For Petitioner: Niraj Kumar Singh, Suresh Kumar Maurya
AI SummaryAllowed

Held

The Court allowed the present petition, following the reasoning adopted in a previous judgment in Writ Tax No. 477 of 2021 (M/s Ratek Pheon Friction Technologies Private Limited Vs. Principal Commissioner & 2 Ors.), which was decided on 15.09.2021. The Court found that the petitioner was entitled to an opportunity to file Form GST TRAN-1 electronically. The reasoning is based on the precedent set in the aforementioned case, which presumably addressed similar technical difficulties faced by taxpayers in filing the transitional form. The ratio decidendi is that taxpayers facing genuine technical impediments in submitting Form GST TRAN-1 should be granted relief. The operative direction is that the petition is allowed on the same terms as the precedent case, implying that the petitioner will be permitted to file the form electronically. No issues were expressly left undecided.

Facts

The petitioner, M/s Rewati Traders, filed a writ petition before the High Court challenging the inability to submit Form GST TRAN-1 electronically on the GST Portal. The petition concerns the submission of this form, which is crucial for transitioning to the Goods and Services Tax regime. The specific tax period for which the TRAN-1 was intended to be filed is not explicitly stated in the judgment. The order or action under challenge is the alleged failure of the GST portal to accept the electronic submission of Form GST TRAN-1. The authority against whom the action is directed is implicitly the GST authorities responsible for the portal's functionality. The amount in dispute is not mentioned. The procedural history is limited to the filing of the writ petition.

Key Issues

1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to an opportunity to file Form GST TRAN-1 electronically on the GST Portal, considering the technical difficulties or portal issues that may have prevented its timely submission? This issue turns on the interpretation and application of provisions related to transitional arrangements under GST law, potentially including Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017, and relevant rules. The petitioner argued that they faced technical issues with the GST portal, preventing the electronic submission of Form GST TRAN-1. They relied on the principle that genuine difficulties in filing should be addressed. The respondent revenue authorities did not record any specific arguments against the petitioner's claim in the provided judgment excerpt, but their general stance would be to uphold the statutory deadlines and procedures.

Sections Cited

Section 140

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 773 of 2021 Petitioner :- M/S Rewati Traders Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Niraj Kumar Singh,Suresh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Parv Agarwal Hon'ble Naheed Ara Moonis,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.

1.

Heard Shri Neeraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner; Shri Apoorv Hajela, learned Standing Counsel for the State; Shri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the Union of India, Shri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the CGST and Shri Prateek Chandra, learned counsel for respondent no.4. 2. The present petition has filed with respect to submission of Form GST TRAN-1, electronically, on the GST Portal.

3.

The issue raised in this petition is similar to that raised in Writ Tax No. 477 of 2021 (M/s Ratek Pheon Friction Technologies Private Limited Vs. Principal Commissioner & 2 Ors.), which has been allowed by a judgment dated 15.09.2021, along with two other petitions.

4.

For the same reasoning, present petition is also allowed, on the same terms. Order Date :- 23.9.2021 AHA

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.