M/S Universal Enterprises vs. Union Of INDIA And Another

WTAX/1015/2023HC AllahabadGSTCNR UPHC01187627202304 October 20233 pages
For Petitioner: Anil Prakash Mathur
AI SummaryDismissed

Held

The Court held that while an alternative remedy is not an absolute bar to writ jurisdiction, in this case, the impugned order was reasoned and passed after affording an opportunity to the petitioner. The Court found it not a fit case to bypass the efficacious alternative remedy.

Facts

The petitioner challenged an order confirming the demand and recovery of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed and utilized on invoices issued without actual receipt of goods from non-existent suppliers. The petitioner argued that principles of natural justice were violated as cross-examination was denied.

Key Issues

Whether the writ petition is maintainable when an alternative remedy of appeal is available, and whether the denial of cross-examination violated principles of natural justice.

Sections Cited

Section 16, Rule 36, Section 74, Section 122, Section 20, Section 50, Section 107

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:199418-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 1015 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Universal Enterprises Respondent :- Union Of India And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Prakash Mathur Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Krishna Agarawal,Om Prakash Mishra Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.

1.

Heard Shri A.P. Mathur, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Krishna Agarwal, learned counsel for revenue and Shri Om Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the Union of India.

2.

The instant writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 25.04.2023 passed by the Joint Commissioner, Central GST, Ghaziabad whereby and whereunder the Input Tax Credit availed and further utilized by the petitioner against invoices issued without actual receipt of goods has been held to be inadmissible in terms of Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 36 of CGST rules, 2017 and the demand and recovery of input tax credit amounting to Rs. 15,64,58,361 (IGST 8,04,90,895/- +CGST Rs/ 3,79,83,733/- + SGST Rs. 3,79,83,733/-) availed and utilized on the basis of fake invoices issued by non existent suppliers without concomit

The judgment continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Reproduced from the public record of the Allahabad High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.