Saurabh Chhajer S/O Shri Mahaveer Chand Chhajer vs. Union Of INDIA
Held
The Court considered the contentions of both parties. It found merit in the arguments presented by the Union of India, specifically that there was no documentary evidence or reports to support the petitioner's claim regarding his father's medical condition necessitating treatment. Consequently, the Court was not inclined to grant the third interim bail application. The reasoning is based on the lack of substantiation for the grounds presented by the petitioner for seeking interim bail. The principle that can be cited is that interim bail on humanitarian grounds requires credible evidence to support the claimed exigency. The Court dismissed the application.
Facts
The petitioner, Saurabh Chhajer, filed a third interim bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. The application pertains to Criminal Complaint No. 34/2019, pending before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Jaipur Metropolitan. The complaint involves alleged offences under various sub-sections of Section 132 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, read with Section 69 of the CGST Act. The petitioner's counsel argued that his father is suffering from several ailments and requires hospitalization. The respondent, Union of India, through the Intelligence Officer of the Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence, opposed the bail application, stating that no reports indicated the petitioner's father needed treatment.
Key Issues
1. Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim bail on medical grounds of his father, considering the allegations under the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017? Petitioner's Contention: The petitioner argued that his father is suffering from several ailments and requires hospital treatment, thus warranting interim bail. Respondent's Contention: The Union of India opposed the application, asserting that no reports were presented to substantiate the claim that the petitioner's father required medical treatment.
Sections Cited
Section 132, Section 69
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
Order 01/06/2020
Defect/s pointed out by the Registry is waived.
Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the Union of India through video conferencing.
Petitioner has filed third (interim) bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
Criminal Complaint No.34/2019 is pending before the Court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences), Jaipur Metropolitan for offence under Sections 132(1), (b), (c), (f), (g), (k), (i) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with 69 of CGST Act pu
The judgment continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full GST judgments a month (one account works on both bharattax.net and this site). Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Reproduced from the public record of the Rajasthan High Court. Verify against the court's own copy before relying on it. Income tax judgments are on bharattax.net.